Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs Wizardlm 70b
Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Meta
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Wizardlm 70b leads 34.8 to 28.2.
Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 33.0 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Wizardlm 70b leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1081 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |
Reasoning Wizardlm 70b leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1079 |
Math Wizardlm 70b leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1116 |
Multilingual Wizardlm 70b leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1155 |
Instruction Following Wizardlm 70b leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1093 |
Long Context Wizardlm 70b leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Wizardlm 70b leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Wizardlm 70b?
Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Wizardlm 70b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.4 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Wizardlm 70b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.