Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs StarCoder 2 7B

Codellama 34b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#285); StarCoder 2 7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.2

Rank #285 Confirmed

StarCoder 2 7B NVIDIA

36.5

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and StarCoder 2 7B in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where StarCoder 2 7B leads 34.2 to 28.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 37.1% for Codellama 34b Instruct and 27.7% for StarCoder 2 7B.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and StarCoder 2 7B specifications
Codellama 34b InstructStarCoder 2 7B
ProviderMetaNVIDIA
Noometry Index30.236.5
Released—2024-02-20
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked147

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding StarCoder 2 7B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310), StarCoder 2 7B: 34.2

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStarCoder 2 7B
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%27.7%
HumanEval+43.9%29.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
LMArena Coding1046—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Hard Prompts1032—
Epoch Capabilities Index—92.92
WinoGrande—57.1%

Math Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Math1056—
GSM8K—32.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, StarCoder 2 7B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStarCoder 2 7B
ARC (AI2) Challenge—38.7%
MMLU—38.8%

Multilingual Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Non-English1011—
LMArena Chinese976—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Instruction Following1028—

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Longer Query1014—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Text1066—
LMArena Creative Writing1032—
LMArena Multi-Turn1015—

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than StarCoder 2 7B?

Codellama 34b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#285); StarCoder 2 7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or StarCoder 2 7B better for coding?

StarCoder 2 7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and StarCoder 2 7B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 7B has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper