Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.6 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.2

Rank #285 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B Alibaba (Qwen)

41.6

Rank #120 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads 60.2 to 28.4.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B specifications
Codellama 34b InstructQwen3.5 122B-A10B
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.241.6
Released—2026-02-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$3.20
Results tracked1427

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 38.8 (#155)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Coding10461436
LMArena WebDev—1360
SciCode—35.6%
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 26.4 (#121)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Hard Prompts10321421
NYT Connections (extended)—51.7%
CritPt—0.9%
Thematic Generalization—51.2%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84.3%
LMCA—32.2%

Math Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 36.4 (#114)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Math10561432

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 38.2 (#138)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.5 122B-A10B
Vectara Hallucination Rate—11.2%
LMArena Expert—1431

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.0 (#52)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Vision—1245

Multilingual Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 51.8 (#101)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Non-English10111400
LMArena Chinese9761462
LMArena French—1442
LMArena German—1425
LMArena Japanese—1364
LMArena Korean—1353
LMArena Russian—1400
LMArena Spanish—1423

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 74.0 (#109)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Instruction Following10281399

Long Context Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 43.0 (#105)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Longer Query10141410

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 60.2 (#98)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Text10661417
LMArena Creative Writing10321369
LMArena Multi-Turn10151416

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.6 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Qwen3.5 122B-A10B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.8 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper