Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Qwen Max

Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

Qwen Max Alibaba (Qwen)

34.7

Rank #230 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Max in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Max leads 47.8 to 28.2.
  • Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen Max specifications
Codellama 34b InstructQwen Max
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.834.7
Released—2024-04-03
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—33K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.60
Output $ / M tokens—$6.40
Results tracked1423

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen Max leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen Max
LMArena Coding10461288
Aider Polyglot—21.8%
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning Qwen Max leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen Max
LMArena Hard Prompts10321269

Math Codellama 34b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen Max
LMArena Math10561275
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—16.1%
MATH Level 5—67.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen Max
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
LMArena Expert—1248

Multilingual Qwen Max leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen Max
LMArena Non-English10111263
LMArena Chinese9761254
LMArena French—1330
LMArena German—1254
LMArena Japanese—1205
LMArena Korean—1142
LMArena Russian—1274
LMArena Spanish—1290

Instruction Following Qwen Max leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen Max
LMArena Instruction Following10281262

Long Context Qwen Max leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen Max
LMArena Longer Query10131288
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%

Writing & Preference Qwen Max leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen Max
LMArena Text10661282
LMArena Creative Writing10321248
LMArena Multi-Turn10151277

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Qwen Max?

Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Qwen Max better for coding?

Qwen Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.7 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen Max share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper