Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs phi-3-medium 14B
Codellama 34b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Meta
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and phi-3-medium 14B in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where phi-3-medium 14B leads 36.3 to 28.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 37.1% for Codellama 34b Instruct and 48.7% for phi-3-medium 14B.
Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 29.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding phi-3-medium 14B leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | 48.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Codellama 34b Instruct leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227), phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1014 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than phi-3-medium 14B?
Codellama 34b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 34b Instruct or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and phi-3-medium 14B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.