Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 49.1 to 28.2.
Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 38.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1319 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1302 |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1316 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1273 |
Multilingual Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1254 |
Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1275 |
Long Context Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.