Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Mercury

Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

Mercury Inception

37.6

Rank #199 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Mercury in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mercury leads 46.2 to 28.2.
  • Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and Mercury specifications
Codellama 34b InstructMercury
ProviderMetaInception
Noometry Index30.837.6
Released——
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked149

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mercury leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Mercury: 38.7 (#170)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMercury
LMArena Coding10461322
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning Codellama 34b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Mercury: 17.5 (#293)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMercury
LMArena Hard Prompts10321285
Kagi LLM Benchmark—21.6%

Math Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Mercury: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMercury
LMArena Math1056—

Multilingual Mercury leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Mercury: 41.6 (#206)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMercury
LMArena Non-English10111260
LMArena Chinese976—

Instruction Following Mercury leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Mercury: 65.2 (#224)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMercury
LMArena Instruction Following10281239

Long Context Mercury leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Mercury: 38.4 (#198)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMercury
LMArena Longer Query10131266

Writing & Preference Mercury leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Mercury: 46.2 (#221)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMercury
LMArena Text10661282
LMArena Creative Writing10321191
LMArena Multi-Turn10151282

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Mercury?

Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Mercury better for coding?

Mercury scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Mercury share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper