Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Llama 3-8B

Codellama 34b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Llama 3-8B in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Codellama 34b Instruct leads 31.0 to 8.8.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and Llama 3-8B specifications
Codellama 34b InstructLlama 3-8B
ProviderMetaMeta
Noometry Index30.825.5
Released—2024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1434

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3-8B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructLlama 3-8B
BigCodeBench Instruct29%31.9%
LMArena Coding10461152
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%36.9%
HumanEval+43.9%56.7%
MBPP+56.3%54.8%

Reasoning Codellama 34b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructLlama 3-8B
LMArena Hard Prompts10321133
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—43.9%
Adversarial NLI—57.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—116.45
ForecastBench—58.6
WinoGrande—75.7%

Math Codellama 34b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructLlama 3-8B
LMArena Math10561151
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—1.9%
MATH Level 5—6.1%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructLlama 3-8B
GPQA Diamond—26.1%
LMArena Expert—1113
ARC (AI2) Challenge—82.8%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—82.6%
TriviaQA—67.7%

Multilingual Llama 3-8B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructLlama 3-8B
LMArena Non-English10111098
LMArena Chinese9761076
LMArena French—1159
LMArena German—1104
LMArena Japanese—967
LMArena Korean—1004
LMArena Russian—1109
LMArena Spanish—1173

Instruction Following Llama 3-8B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructLlama 3-8B
LMArena Instruction Following10281127

Long Context Llama 3-8B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructLlama 3-8B
LMArena Longer Query10131128

Writing & Preference Llama 3-8B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructLlama 3-8B
LMArena Text10661166
LMArena Creative Writing10321150
LMArena Multi-Turn10151152

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Llama 3-8B?

Codellama 34b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Llama 3-8B better for coding?

Llama 3-8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.0 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Llama 3-8B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper