Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Grok 4.1 Fast

Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

Grok 4.1 Fast xAI

41.4

Rank #136 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.1 Fast in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 57.2 to 28.2.
  • Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and Grok 4.1 Fast specifications
Codellama 34b InstructGrok 4.1 Fast
ProviderMetaxAI
Noometry Index30.841.4
Released—2025-06-27
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—128K
Max output—30K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.20
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked1432

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Grok 4.1 Fast: 34.1 (#245)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Coding10461411
LMArena WebDev—1242
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
ALE-Bench—394.93
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#39)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 4.1 Fast
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—69.6%
τ²-bench Banking—13.1%
LMArena Search—1171
Vending-Bench 2—1,107

Reasoning Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Grok 4.1 Fast: 43.4 (#49)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Hard Prompts10321407
SimpleBench—56%
NYT Connections (extended)—87.4%
DTBench—87.7%
ForecastBench—61

Math Too close to call

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Grok 4.1 Fast: 31.9 (#221)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Math10561408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.9%
ProofBench—4%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.1 (#207)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 4.1 Fast
Vectara Hallucination Rate—17.8%
LMArena Expert—1399

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 37.0 (#76)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Vision—1201

Multilingual Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.0 (#114)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Non-English10111391
LMArena Chinese9761441
LMArena French—1415
LMArena German—1404
LMArena Japanese—1349
LMArena Korean—1361
LMArena Russian—1387
LMArena Spanish—1413

Instruction Following Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.7 (#133)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Instruction Following10281376

Long Context Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#126)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Longer Query10131390

Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.2 (#131)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Text10661408
LMArena Creative Writing10321394
LMArena Multi-Turn10151389
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1327

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Grok 4.1 Fast?

Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Grok 4.1 Fast better for coding?

Grok 4.1 Fast scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Grok 4.1 Fast share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 Fast has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper