Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs GLM-5

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

GLM-5 Z.ai (Zhipu)

46.1

Rank #66 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5 leads 66.0 to 28.2.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and GLM-5 specifications
Codellama 34b InstructGLM-5
ProviderMetaZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index30.846.1
Released—2026-02-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1
Output $ / M tokens—$3.20
Results tracked1445

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), GLM-5: 49.0 (#52)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-5
LMArena Coding10461461
SWE-bench Verified—72.1%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—72.8%
LMArena WebDev—1434
SWE-bench Multilingual—69.7%
WeirdML—48.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
ALE-Bench—765.62
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, GLM-5: 31.1 (#71)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-5
Terminal-Bench—52.4%
τ²-bench Airline—82.5%
τ²-bench Banking—9.8%
τ²-bench Retail—73.7%
τ²-bench Telecom—86.8%
Vending-Bench 2—4,432

Reasoning GLM-5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), GLM-5: 27.6 (#116)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-5
LMArena Hard Prompts10321452
ARC-AGI-2—4.9%
SimpleBench—53.2%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—75%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
ARC-AGI-1—44.7%
Chess Puzzles—10%
Epoch Capabilities Index—145.83
ForecastBench—61

Math GLM-5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), GLM-5: 46.4 (#71)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-5
LMArena Math10561440
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—65.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—80%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—16.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, GLM-5: 52.3 (#64)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-5
GPQA Diamond—87.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.1%
LMArena Expert—1454

Multilingual GLM-5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), GLM-5: 53.7 (#58)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-5
LMArena Non-English10111430
LMArena Chinese9761511
LMArena French—1455
LMArena German—1445
LMArena Japanese—1416
LMArena Korean—1423
LMArena Russian—1436
LMArena Spanish—1454

Instruction Following GLM-5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), GLM-5: 75.2 (#67)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-5
LMArena Instruction Following10281428

Long Context GLM-5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), GLM-5: 44.7 (#60)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-5
LMArena Longer Query10131446
CL-bench—18.7%

Writing & Preference GLM-5 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), GLM-5: 66.0 (#38)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-5
LMArena Text10661446
LMArena Creative Writing10321439
LMArena Multi-Turn10151456
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1601

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than GLM-5?

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or GLM-5 better for coding?

GLM-5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.0 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and GLM-5 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5 has 45.

Related comparisons

Go deeper