Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 60.9 to 28.2.
- Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 40.8 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-03 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 38 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1400 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1256 |
| SciCode | — | 41.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 52.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 797.73 |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 37.3% |
Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1407 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 67.2% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 8.2% |
| CritPt | — | 1.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 25% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 3% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 76.8% |
| LMCA | — | 35% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.47 |
| ForecastBench | — | 54.4 |
Math Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1428 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 27.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 80% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 81.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 8.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1398 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1240 |
Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1411 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1461 |
| LMArena French | — | 1424 |
| LMArena German | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1420 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1421 |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1377 |
Long Context Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1394 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1416 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1417 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38.