Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs DeepSeek Coder 1.3B

Codellama 34b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#285); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.2

Rank #285 Confirmed

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B DeepSeek

34.5

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and DeepSeek Coder 1.3B in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 37.1% for Codellama 34b Instruct and 29.6% for DeepSeek Coder 1.3B.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and DeepSeek Coder 1.3B specifications
Codellama 34b InstructDeepSeek Coder 1.3B
ProviderMetaDeepSeek
Noometry Index30.234.5
Released—2023-11-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked149

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek Coder 1.3B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310), DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 30.7 (#282)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek Coder 1.3B
BigCodeBench Instruct29%22.8%
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%29.6%
HumanEval+43.9%60.4%
MBPP+56.3%54.8%
LMArena Coding1046—

Reasoning Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250), DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek Coder 1.3B
LMArena Hard Prompts1032—
Epoch Capabilities Index—62.18
WinoGrande—53.3%

Math Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227), DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek Coder 1.3B
LMArena Math1056—
GSM8K—4.4%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek Coder 1.3B
ARC (AI2) Challenge—25.4%
MMLU—25.8%

Multilingual Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279), DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek Coder 1.3B
LMArena Non-English1011—
LMArena Chinese976—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286), DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek Coder 1.3B
LMArena Instruction Following1028—

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279), DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek Coder 1.3B
LMArena Longer Query1014—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292), DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructDeepSeek Coder 1.3B
LMArena Text1066—
LMArena Creative Writing1032—
LMArena Multi-Turn1015—

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than DeepSeek Coder 1.3B?

Codellama 34b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#285); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better for coding?

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.7 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and DeepSeek Coder 1.3B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper