Model comparison
Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3 Max
Claude Sonnet 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 43.7 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Max costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 29 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 29 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3 Max in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5 leads 66.2 to 38.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 65.6% for Claude Sonnet 5 and 18.9% for Qwen3 Max.
- Qwen3 Max is cheaper at $1.20 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for Claude Sonnet 5.
- Claude Sonnet 5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 54.6 | 43.7 |
| Released | 2026-06-29 | 2025-09-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 51 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 55.5 (#26), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,463 | 370.45 |
| DeepSWE | 53.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 42.7% | — |
| CursorBench | 34.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1541 | — |
| SciCode | 54.3% | — |
| GSO | 37.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 68.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5: 42.8 (#18), Qwen3 Max: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 6,378 | 71.56 |
| APEX-Agents | 54.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 65.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1194 | — |
Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 49.1 (#39), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 75.1% | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 35% | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1461 | 1448 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 35% | 5% |
| DTBench | 92.5% | 82.1% |
| LMCA | 50% | 28.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.21 | 142.38 |
| SimpleBench | 60.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| CritPt | 16.9% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 60% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.14 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.1 | — |
Math Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 66.2 (#27), Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 65.6% | 18.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 94.7% | 73.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1467 | 1446 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 29.3% | — |
| ProofBench | 77% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |
Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 55.6 (#47), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.5% | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 33.7% | 48.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1490 | 1455 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5: 42.4 (#31), Qwen3 Max: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 24.9% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1466 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Claude Sonnet 5: 53.8 (#55), Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1431 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1477 | 1478 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | 1449 |
| LMArena German | 1440 | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | 1399 |
| LMArena Russian | 1451 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1437 | 1462 |
Instruction Following Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 76.3 (#41), Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1452 | 1419 |
Long Context Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 44.8 (#55), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | 1438 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |
Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 69.2 (#25), Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1442 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1454 | 1446 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1794 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1236 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 5 better than Qwen3 Max?
Claude Sonnet 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 43.7 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Max costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3 Max?
Qwen3 Max is cheaper. It lists at $1.20 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5 lists at $2 and $10.
Is Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3 Max better for coding?
Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Claude Sonnet 5 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3 Max share?
29 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5 has 51 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.