Model comparison
Claude Sonnet 5 vs o1-mini
Claude Sonnet 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher in 9 categories and o1-mini in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Sonnet 5 leads 49.1 to 8.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 94.7% for Claude Sonnet 5 and 46.9% for o1-mini.
Side by side
| Claude Sonnet 5 | o1-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 54.6 | 34.0 |
| Released | 2026-06-29 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 51 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 55.5 (#26), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 68.8% | 36.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1362 |
| DeepSWE | 53.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 42.7% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.9% |
| CursorBench | 34.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1541 | — |
| SciCode | 54.3% | — |
| GSO | 37.3% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 48% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,463 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 78.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 42.8 (#18), o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 54.5% | — |
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| GBAEval | 65.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1194 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 6,378 | — |
Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 49.1 (#39), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 60.6% | 18.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1461 | 1333 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.21 | 135.82 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 75.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 14% |
| CritPt | 16.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 35% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 72.3% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 35% | — |
| DTBench | 92.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 57.9% |
| LMCA | 50% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 60% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.14 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.1 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 57.8% |
Math Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 66.2 (#27), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 94.7% | 46.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1467 | 1358 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 65.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 29.3% | — |
| ProofBench | 77% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 62% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 89.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 55.6 (#47), o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.5% | 62.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1490 | 1316 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 33.7% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 18.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5: 42.4 (#31), o1-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 24.9% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1466 | — |
Multilingual Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 53.8 (#55), o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1431 | 1289 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1477 | 1314 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | 1293 |
| LMArena German | 1440 | 1278 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | 1245 |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | 1223 |
| LMArena Russian | 1451 | 1283 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1437 | 1303 |
Instruction Following Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 76.3 (#41), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1452 | 1304 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 65.4% |
Long Context Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 44.8 (#55), o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | 1320 |
Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 69.2 (#25), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1442 | 1317 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | 1244 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1454 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 64.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1794 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1236 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 40.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 5 better than o1-mini?
Claude Sonnet 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Sonnet 5 or o1-mini better for coding?
Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5 and o1-mini share?
22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5 has 51 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.