Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Mixtral 8x22B

Claude Sonnet 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic

54.6

Rank #29 Confirmed

Mixtral 8x22B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #333 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher in 9 categories and Mixtral 8x22B in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5 leads 66.2 to 22.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 68.8% for Claude Sonnet 5 and 3.2% for Mixtral 8x22B.
  • Mixtral 8x22B is cheaper at $2 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for Claude Sonnet 5.
  • Claude Sonnet 5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 64K.
  • Mixtral 8x22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5Mixtral 8x22B
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
Noometry Index54.627.1
Released2026-06-292024-04-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M64K
Max output128K64K
Input $ / M tokens$2$2
Output $ / M tokens$10$6
Results tracked5134

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 55.5 (#26), Mixtral 8x22B: 24.2 (#329)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Mixtral 8x22B
WeirdML68.8%3.2%
LMArena Coding14831166
DeepSWE53.8%—
FrontierCode42.7%—
CursorBench34.1%—
LMArena WebDev1541—
SciCode54.3%—
GSO37.3%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—40.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—50.2%
ALE-Bench1,463—
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—64.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 42.8 (#18), Mixtral 8x22B: 23.1 (#127)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Mixtral 8x22B
APEX-Agents54.5%—
Cybench—7.5%
GBAEval65.3%—
LMArena Search1194—
Vending-Bench 26,378—

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 49.1 (#39), Mixtral 8x22B: 19.9 (#248)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Hard Prompts14611150
DTBench92.5%55.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index156.21122.03
ForecastBench61.156.3
SimpleBench60.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)75.1%—
CritPt16.9%—
Chess Puzzles35%—
Mystery Game Puzzles35%—
LMCA50%—
Surface Evolver Bench60%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—

Math Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 66.2 (#27), Mixtral 8x22B: 22.9 (#275)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Math14671184
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)65.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 429.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.7%—
ProofBench77%—
Omni-MATH—16.3%
MATH Level 5—24.2%

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 55.6 (#47), Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#293)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Mixtral 8x22B
GPQA Diamond90.5%34.1%
LMArena Expert14901113
SimpleQA Verified33.7%—
MMLU-Pro—46%
GPQA (HELM)—33.4%
MMLU—77.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5: 42.4 (#31), Mixtral 8x22B: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Vision1274—
Blueprint-Bench 224.9%—
LMArena Document1466—

Multilingual Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 53.8 (#55), Mixtral 8x22B: 32.8 (#255)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Non-English14311128
LMArena Chinese14771116
LMArena French14601166
LMArena German14401141
LMArena Japanese14221037
LMArena Korean14111057
LMArena Russian14511158
LMArena Spanish14371151

Instruction Following Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 76.3 (#41), Mixtral 8x22B: 57.7 (#266)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Instruction Following14521147
IFEval—72.4%

Long Context Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 44.8 (#55), Mixtral 8x22B: 34.7 (#247)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Longer Query14631144

Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 69.2 (#25), Mixtral 8x22B: 36.9 (#262)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Text14421162
LMArena Creative Writing14161141
LMArena Multi-Turn14541130
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1794—
WildBench—71.1%
EQ-Bench 41236—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5 better than Mixtral 8x22B?

Claude Sonnet 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or Mixtral 8x22B?

Mixtral 8x22B is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5 lists at $2 and $10.

Is Claude Sonnet 5 or Mixtral 8x22B better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 24.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 5 does, with 1M tokens against 64K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5 and Mixtral 8x22B share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5 has 51 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x22B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper