Model comparison
Claude Sonnet 5 vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Claude Sonnet 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Medium 3.1 costs 5.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Medium 3.1 in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Sonnet 5 leads 49.1 to 10.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 75.1% for Claude Sonnet 5 and 6.5% for Mistral Medium 3.1.
- Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper at $0.40 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for Claude Sonnet 5.
- Claude Sonnet 5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Claude Sonnet 5 | Mistral Medium 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 54.6 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2026-06-29 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 131K |
| Max output | 128K | 105K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $2 |
| Results tracked | 51 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5: 55.5 (#26), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 53.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 42.7% | — |
| CursorBench | 34.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1541 | — |
| SciCode | 54.3% | — |
| GSO | 37.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 68.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,463 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5: 42.8 (#18), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 54.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 65.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1194 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 6,378 | — |
Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 49.1 (#39), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 75.1% | 6.5% |
| SimpleBench | 60.6% | — |
| CritPt | 16.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 35% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1461 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 35% | — |
| DTBench | 92.5% | — |
| LMCA | 50% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 60% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.14 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.21 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.1 | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5: 66.2 (#27), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 65.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 29.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 94.7% | — |
| ProofBench | 77% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1467 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5: 55.6 (#47), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 33.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1490 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5: 42.4 (#31), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 24.9% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1466 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5: 53.8 (#55), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1431 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1477 | — |
| LMArena French | 1460 | — |
| LMArena German | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1451 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1437 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5: 76.3 (#41), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1452 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5: 44.8 (#55), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | — |
Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 69.2 (#25), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1794 | 1476 |
| LMArena Text | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1236 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1454 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 5 better than Mistral Medium 3.1?
Claude Sonnet 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Medium 3.1 costs 5.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or Mistral Medium 3.1?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5 lists at $2 and $10.
Which has the bigger context window?
Claude Sonnet 5 does, with 1M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5 and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5 has 51 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.