Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

Claude Sonnet 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic

54.5

Rank #26 Confirmed

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

41.8

Rank #114 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5 leads 66.1 to 36.0.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5Hunyuan T1 20250711
ProviderAnthropicTencent
Noometry Index54.541.8
Released2026-06-29—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked5113

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 55.5 (#20), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Coding14831389
DeepSWE53.8%—
FrontierCode42.7%—
CursorBench34.1%—
LMArena WebDev1540—
SciCode53.6%—
GSO37.3%—
WeirdML68.8%—
ALE-Bench1,463—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5: 42.7 (#16), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Hunyuan T1 20250711
APEX-Agents54.5%—
GBAEval65.3%—
LMArena Search1194—
Vending-Bench 26,378—

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 48.2 (#37), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Hard Prompts14611399
SimpleBench60.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)75.1%—
CritPt16.9%—
Chess Puzzles35%—
Mystery Game Puzzles35%—
DTBench92.5%—
LMCA50%—
Surface Evolver Bench60%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.34—
ForecastBench61.1—

Math Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 66.1 (#21), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Math14671414
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)65.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 429.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.7%—
ProofBench77%—

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 55.7 (#42), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Expert14911395
GPQA Diamond90.5%—
SimpleQA Verified33.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5: 42.4 (#26), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Vision1275—
Blueprint-Bench 224.9%—
LMArena Document1466—

Multilingual Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 54.0 (#55), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Non-English14311395
LMArena Chinese14751424
LMArena Korean14111403
LMArena Russian14521384
LMArena French1457—
LMArena German1448—
LMArena Japanese1422—
LMArena Spanish1436—

Instruction Following Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 76.6 (#39), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Instruction Following14531375

Long Context Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 44.8 (#53), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Longer Query14641384

Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5: 69.4 (#24), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Text14431401
LMArena Creative Writing14161391
LMArena Multi-Turn14541393
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1794—
EQ-Bench 41236—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5 better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Claude Sonnet 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Sonnet 5 or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5 has 51 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper