Model comparison
Claude Sonnet 5 vs Grok 4.7
Claude Sonnet 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 53.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 36 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 36 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher in 7 categories and Grok 4.7 in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5 leads 66.2 to 57.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 77% for Claude Sonnet 5 and 34% for Grok 4.7.
- Grok 4.7 is cheaper at $2 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for Claude Sonnet 5.
- Claude Sonnet 5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 500K.
Side by side
| Claude Sonnet 5 | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 54.6 | 53.1 |
| Released | 2026-06-29 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 500K |
| Max output | 128K | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 51 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 55.5 (#26), Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 42.7% | 47.6% |
| CursorBench | 34.1% | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1541 | 1639 |
| SciCode | 54.3% | 57.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1427 |
| DeepSWE | 53.8% | — |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| GSO | 37.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 68.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,463 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 42.8 (#18), Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 54.5% | 54.6% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 6,378 | 10,537 |
| GBAEval | 65.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | — | 22.8% |
| LMArena Search | 1194 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Claude Sonnet 5: 49.1 (#39), Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 75.1% | 76.8% |
| CritPt | 16.9% | 18% |
| Chess Puzzles | 35% | 38% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1461 | 1413 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 35% | 29% |
| DTBench | 92.5% | 96% |
| LMCA | 50% | 49.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.21 | 153.53 |
| SimpleBench | 60.6% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 60% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.14 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.1 | — |
Math Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 66.2 (#27), Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 65.6% | 53% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 29.3% | 17.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 94.7% | 98.1% |
| ProofBench | 77% | 34% |
| LMArena Math | 1467 | 1407 |
Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 55.6 (#47), Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.5% | 92.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 33.7% | 56% |
| LMArena Expert | 1490 | 1422 |
Multimodal Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 42.4 (#31), Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | 1228 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 24.9% | 32.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |
| LMArena Document | 1466 | — |
Multilingual Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 53.8 (#55), Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1431 | 1389 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1477 | 1455 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | 1455 |
| LMArena Russian | 1451 | 1397 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1437 | 1400 |
| LMArena German | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | — |
Instruction Following Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 76.3 (#41), Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1452 | 1404 |
Long Context Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 44.8 (#55), Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | 1413 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Claude Sonnet 5: 69.2 (#25), Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1442 | 1399 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | 1391 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1794 | 2007 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1454 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1236 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 5 better than Grok 4.7?
Claude Sonnet 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 53.1 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5 lists at $2 and $10.
Is Claude Sonnet 5 or Grok 4.7 better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 55.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Claude Sonnet 5 does, with 1M tokens against 500K.
How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5 and Grok 4.7 share?
36 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5 has 51 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 39.