Model comparison
Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 54.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 47 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 47 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher in 5 categories and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview in 5 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 49.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GBAEval: 65.3% for Claude Sonnet 5 and 0.8% for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
- Claude Sonnet 5 is cheaper at $2 / $10 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $12 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
Side by side
| Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 54.6 | 56.7 |
| Released | 2026-06-29 | 2026-02-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 128K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $12 |
| Results tracked | 51 | 71 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 55.5 (#26), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.5 (#99)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 53.8% | 11.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1541 | 1447 |
| SciCode | 54.3% | 58.9% |
| GSO | 37.3% | 22.6% |
| WeirdML | 68.8% | 72.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1484 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,463 | 1,161 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 75.6% |
| FrontierCode | 42.7% | — |
| CursorBench | 34.1% | — |
| MirrorCode | — | 8.9% |
| AlgoTune | — | 2.02 |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 42.8 (#18), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#34)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 54.5% | 35.3% |
| GBAEval | 65.3% | 0.8% |
| LMArena Search | 1194 | 1211 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 6,378 | 3,774 |
| Terminal-Bench | — | 80.2% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 26% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 47.8% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 22% |
| BALROG | — | 57% |
| ExploitBench | — | 26.1% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 17% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 77% |
Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 49.1 (#39), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#12)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 60.6% | 79.6% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 75.1% | 97.4% |
| CritPt | 16.9% | 17.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 35% | 55% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1461 | 1485 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 35% | 34% |
| DTBench | 92.5% | 97.1% |
| LMCA | 50% | 53.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.21 | 154.77 |
| ForecastBench | 61.1 | 59 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 77.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 98% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 36.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 79.4% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 14.3% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 60% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.14 | — |
Math Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 66.2 (#27), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 62.1 (#34)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 65.6% | 59.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 29.3% | 26.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 94.7% | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | 77% | 26% |
| LMArena Math | 1467 | 1485 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 86.5% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 36.9% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 16.7% |
Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 55.6 (#47), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.5% | 94.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 33.7% | 73.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1490 | 1485 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 46.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.4% |
Multimodal Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 42.4 (#31), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | 1296 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 24.9% | 26.5% |
| LMArena Document | 1466 | 1444 |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 26.7% |
Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 53.8 (#55), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.0 (#12)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1431 | 1477 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1477 | 1529 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | 1487 |
| LMArena German | 1440 | 1491 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | 1493 |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | 1455 |
| LMArena Russian | 1451 | 1498 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1437 | 1479 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Claude Sonnet 5: 76.3 (#41), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.0 (#32)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1452 | 1466 |
Long Context Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 44.8 (#55), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.4 (#18)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | 1483 |
| CL-bench | — | 20.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 16.9% |
Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5: 69.2 (#25), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.1 (#37)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1442 | 1481 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | 1482 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1794 | 1491 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1236 | 1142 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1454 | 1488 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 5 better than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 54.6 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?
Claude Sonnet 5 is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview lists at $2 and $12.
Is Claude Sonnet 5 or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better for coding?
Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 42.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview share?
47 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5 has 51 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71.