Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

60.5

Rank #10 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 88.7 to 34.9.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is cheaper at $1.50 / $7.50 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for Claude Sonnet 5.5.
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Claude Sonnet 5.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index60.537.7
Released2026-09-282025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M262K
Max output128K66K
Input $ / M tokens$2$1.50
Output $ / M tokens$10$7.50
Results tracked1625

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 65.5 (#6), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena WebDev16991275
ALE-Bench1,819461.45
FrontierCode52.1%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
CursorBench55.5%—
FrontierSWE61.9%—
SciCode61%—
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
LMArena Coding—1413
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 44.9 (#14), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%
APEX-Agents75.5%—

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 52.4 (#29), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
CritPt31.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1372
Mystery Game Puzzles65%—

Math Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 88.7 (#4), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)88.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 480.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
LMArena Math—1364

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#11), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
GPQA Diamond95.6%—
SimpleQA Verified46.5%—
LMArena Expert—1337

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 53.2 (#5), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Furniture Assembly75%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1345
LMArena Chinese—1356
LMArena French—1394
LMArena German—1324
LMArena Japanese—1309
LMArena Korean—1307
LMArena Russian—1367
LMArena Spanish—1360

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following—1356

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1379

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text—1356
LMArena Creative Writing—1333
LMArena Multi-Turn—1365

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5 lists at $2 and $10.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 65.5 versus 36.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper