Model comparison
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Claude Sonnet 5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#10); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 67.3 to 37.7.
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is cheaper at $0.35 / $1.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for Claude Sonnet 5.5.
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 61.9 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2026-09-28 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | 131K |
| Max output | 128K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 67.3 (#6), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 52.1% | — |
| CursorBench | 55.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1774 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 61.9% | — |
| SciCode | 61% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 39.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1513 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.2% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,819 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.0 (#16), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 75.5% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 54.0 (#28), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 80.5% | — |
| CritPt | 31.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1495 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 65% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 165.03 | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 87.9 (#6), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 88.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 80.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1510 | — |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 2.9% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#12), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1540 | — |
| MMLU | — | 79.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 51.5 (#6), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1289 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 75% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 55.3 (#30), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1452 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1522 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1451 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 78.3 (#11), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1495 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.9 (#28), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1498 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#40), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1471 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1474 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#10); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.40 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5 lists at $2 and $10.
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better for coding?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.3 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 does, with 1M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3.