Model comparison
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen Max
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.9 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 87.9 to 22.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 100% for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and 16.1% for Qwen Max.
- Qwen Max is cheaper at $1.60 / $6.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for Claude Sonnet 5.5.
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 33K.
Side by side
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 61.9 | 34.7 |
| Released | 2026-09-28 | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 33K |
| Max output | 128K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 67.3 (#6), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1513 | 1288 |
| FrontierCode | 52.1% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| CursorBench | 55.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1774 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 61.9% | — |
| SciCode | 61% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,819 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.0 (#16), Qwen Max: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 75.5% | — |
Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 54.0 (#28), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1495 | 1269 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 80.5% | — |
| CritPt | 31.4% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 65% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 165.03 | — |
Math Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 87.9 (#6), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1510 | 1275 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 88.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 80.5% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 2.9% | — |
Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#12), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.6% | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1540 | 1248 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 51.5 (#6), Qwen Max: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1289 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 75% | — |
Multilingual Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 55.3 (#30), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1452 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1522 | 1254 |
| LMArena Russian | 1451 | 1274 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 78.3 (#11), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1495 | 1262 |
Long Context Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.9 (#28), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1498 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#40), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1471 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1474 | 1277 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Qwen Max?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.9 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Qwen Max?
Qwen Max is cheaper. It lists at $1.60 per million input tokens and $6.40 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5 lists at $2 and $10.
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Qwen Max better for coding?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.3 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 does, with 1M tokens against 33K.
How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Qwen Max share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.