Model comparison
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Phi-4 Mini
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.9 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 30× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 5.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in 3 categories and Phi-4 Mini in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 66.0 to 25.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 61% for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and 10.8% for Phi-4 Mini.
- Phi-4 Mini is cheaper at $0.075 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for Claude Sonnet 5.5.
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- Phi-4 Mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Phi-4 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 61.9 | 30.9 |
| Released | 2026-09-28 | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | 128K |
| Max output | 128K | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.075 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 67.3 (#6), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 61% | 10.8% |
| FrontierCode | 52.1% | — |
| CursorBench | 55.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1774 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 61.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1513 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,819 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.0 (#16), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 75.5% | — |
Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 54.0 (#28), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 31.4% | 0% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 80.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1495 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 65% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 165.03 | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 87.9 (#6), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 88.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 80.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1510 | — |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 2.9% | — |
Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#12), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1540 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 51.5 (#6), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1289 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 75% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 55.3 (#30), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1452 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1522 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1451 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 78.3 (#11), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1495 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.9 (#28), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1498 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#40), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1471 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1474 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Phi-4 Mini?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.9 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 30× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 5.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Phi-4 Mini?
Phi-4 Mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5 lists at $2 and $10.
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.3 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Phi-4 Mini share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 32 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.