Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

60.5

Rank #10 Confirmed

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct Microsoft

32.4

Rank #246 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 88.7 to 30.9.
  • Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct specifications
Claude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index60.532.4
Released2026-09-28—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked1617

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 65.5 (#6), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.3 (#263)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
FrontierCode52.1%—
CursorBench55.5%—
LMArena WebDev1699—
FrontierSWE61.9%—
SciCode61%—
LMArena Coding—1130
ALE-Bench1,819—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 44.9 (#14), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
APEX-Agents75.5%—

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 52.4 (#29), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 20.8 (#214)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
CritPt31.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1127
Mystery Game Puzzles65%—

Math Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 88.7 (#4), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.9 (#202)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)88.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 480.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
LMArena Math—1173

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#11), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 29.6 (#226)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
GPQA Diamond95.6%—
SimpleQA Verified46.5%—
LMArena Expert—1108

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 53.2 (#5), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
Furniture Assembly75%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.8 (#258)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1094
LMArena Chinese—1108
LMArena French—1109
LMArena German—1101
LMArena Japanese—1042
LMArena Korean—954
LMArena Russian—1145
LMArena Spanish—1095

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.8 (#263)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following—1114

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.9 (#250)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1120

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.3 (#267)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Text—1138
LMArena Creative Writing—1106
LMArena Multi-Turn—1088

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 65.5 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper