Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs MiniMax M1

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.9 to 40.3 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax M1 costs 4.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 5.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

61.9

Rank #10 Confirmed

MiniMax M1 MiniMax

40.3

Rank #150 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax M1 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 87.9 to 37.5.
  • MiniMax M1 is cheaper at $0.55 / $2.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for Claude Sonnet 5.5.
  • MiniMax M1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and MiniMax M1 specifications
Claude Sonnet 5.5MiniMax M1
ProviderAnthropicMiniMax
Noometry Index61.940.3
Released2026-09-282025-06-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M1M
Max output128K40K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.55
Output $ / M tokens$10$2.20
Results tracked3218

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 67.3 (#6), MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5MiniMax M1
LMArena Coding15131359
FrontierCode52.1%—
CursorBench55.5%—
LMArena WebDev1774—
FrontierSWE61.9%—
SciCode61%—
ALE-Bench1,819—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.0 (#16), MiniMax M1: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5MiniMax M1
APEX-Agents75.5%—

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 54.0 (#28), MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5MiniMax M1
LMArena Hard Prompts14951339
NYT Connections (extended)80.5%—
CritPt31.4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles65%—
Epoch Capabilities Index165.03—

Math Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 87.9 (#6), MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5MiniMax M1
LMArena Math15101361
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)88.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 480.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
FrontierMath Erdős2.9%—

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#12), MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5MiniMax M1
LMArena Expert15401317
GPQA Diamond95.6%—
SimpleQA Verified46.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 51.5 (#6), MiniMax M1: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5MiniMax M1
LMArena Vision1289—
Furniture Assembly75%—

Multilingual Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 55.3 (#30), MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5MiniMax M1
LMArena Non-English14521319
LMArena Chinese15221360
LMArena Russian14511329
LMArena French—1370
LMArena German—1350
LMArena Japanese—1217
LMArena Korean—1266
LMArena Spanish—1353

Instruction Following Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 78.3 (#11), MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5MiniMax M1
LMArena Instruction Following14951312

Long Context Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.9 (#28), MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5MiniMax M1
LMArena Longer Query14981326
Fiction.LiveBench—69.4%

Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#40), MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5MiniMax M1
LMArena Text14711343
LMArena Creative Writing14651298
LMArena Multi-Turn14741335

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than MiniMax M1?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.9 to 40.3 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax M1 costs 4.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 5.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or MiniMax M1?

MiniMax M1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.55 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5 lists at $2 and $10.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or MiniMax M1 better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.3 versus 39.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and MiniMax M1 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 32 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper