Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Hunyuan Large Vision

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.9 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

61.9

Rank #10 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in 9 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 87.9 to 35.5.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5Hunyuan Large Vision
ProviderAnthropicTencent
Noometry Index61.937.6
Released2026-09-28—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked3213

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 67.3 (#6), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Coding15131308
FrontierCode52.1%—
CursorBench55.5%—
LMArena WebDev1774—
FrontierSWE61.9%—
SciCode61%—
ALE-Bench1,819—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.0 (#16), Hunyuan Large Vision: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Hunyuan Large Vision
APEX-Agents75.5%—

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 54.0 (#28), Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Hard Prompts14951257
NYT Connections (extended)80.5%—
CritPt31.4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles65%—
Epoch Capabilities Index165.03—

Math Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 87.9 (#6), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Math15101268
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)88.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 480.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
FrontierMath Erdős2.9%—

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#12), Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Expert15401252
GPQA Diamond95.6%—
SimpleQA Verified46.5%—

Multimodal Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 51.5 (#6), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Vision12891180
Furniture Assembly75%—

Multilingual Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 55.3 (#30), Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Non-English14521236
LMArena Chinese15221287
LMArena Russian14511243

Instruction Following Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 78.3 (#11), Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Instruction Following14951251

Long Context Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.9 (#28), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Longer Query14981280

Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#40), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Text14711263
LMArena Creative Writing14651248
LMArena Multi-Turn14741254

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Hunyuan Large Vision?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.9 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.3 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Hunyuan Large Vision share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 32 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper