Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Grok 4.1

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

60.5

Rank #10 Confirmed

Grok 4.1 xAI

40.8

Rank #135 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Grok 4.1 in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 88.7 to 36.2.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Grok 4.1 specifications
Claude Sonnet 5.5Grok 4.1
ProviderAnthropicxAI
Noometry Index60.540.8
Released2026-09-282025-11-17
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked1619

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 65.5 (#6), Grok 4.1: 33.4 (#246)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Grok 4.1
LMArena WebDev16991214
FrontierCode52.1%—
CursorBench55.5%—
FrontierSWE61.9%—
SciCode61%—
LMArena Coding—1445
ALE-Bench1,819—

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 44.9 (#14), Grok 4.1: 33.8 (#47)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Grok 4.1
APEX-Agents75.5%—
Cybench—39%

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 52.4 (#29), Grok 4.1: 28.3 (#91)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Grok 4.1
CritPt31.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1436
Mystery Game Puzzles65%—

Math Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 88.7 (#4), Grok 4.1: 36.2 (#124)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Grok 4.1
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)88.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 480.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
LMArena Math—1422

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#11), Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#129)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Grok 4.1
GPQA Diamond95.6%—
SimpleQA Verified46.5%—
LMArena Expert—1417

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 53.2 (#5), Grok 4.1: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Grok 4.1
Furniture Assembly75%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Grok 4.1: 53.6 (#64)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Grok 4.1
LMArena Non-English—1425
LMArena Chinese—1464
LMArena French—1448
LMArena German—1447
LMArena Japanese—1396
LMArena Korean—1407
LMArena Russian—1434
LMArena Spanish—1438

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Grok 4.1: 74.0 (#106)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Grok 4.1
LMArena Instruction Following—1400

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#96)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Grok 4.1
LMArena Longer Query—1416

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Grok 4.1: 62.6 (#71)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Grok 4.1
LMArena Text—1437
LMArena Creative Writing—1411
LMArena Multi-Turn—1438

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Grok 4.1?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Grok 4.1 better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 65.5 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Grok 4.1 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper