Model comparison
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-4.5
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.9 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in 10 categories and GPT-4.5 in 0 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 87.9 to 32.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 100% for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and 37.8% for GPT-4.5.
Side by side
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-4.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 61.9 | 37.2 |
| Released | 2026-09-28 | 2025-02-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 32 | 42 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 67.3 (#6), GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1513 | 1396 |
| FrontierCode | 52.1% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 44.9% |
| CursorBench | 55.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1774 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 61.9% | — |
| SciCode | 61% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 39.4% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 75.2% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,819 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.0 (#16), GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 75.5% | — |
| Cybench | — | 17.5% |
Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 54.0 (#28), GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1495 | 1403 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 165.03 | 136.74 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 34.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 80.5% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 10.3% |
| CritPt | 31.4% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 3.2% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 71.1% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 65% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 64.3% |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.7 |
| LiveBench | — | 69% |
Math Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 87.9 (#6), GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | 37.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1510 | 1412 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 88.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 80.5% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 69.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 78.6% |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 2.9% | — |
Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#12), GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.6% | 68.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1540 | 1394 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 5.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.5% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 13.6% |
Multimodal Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 51.5 (#6), GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1289 | 1195 |
| VPCT | — | 45% |
| Furniture Assembly | 75% | — |
Multilingual Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 55.3 (#30), GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1452 | 1413 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1522 | 1421 |
| LMArena Russian | 1451 | 1419 |
| LMArena French | — | 1418 |
| LMArena German | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1392 |
Instruction Following Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 78.3 (#11), GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1495 | 1404 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 72.3% |
Long Context Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.9 (#28), GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1498 | 1406 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 63.9% |
Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#40), GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1471 | 1417 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | 1394 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1474 | 1444 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 75.6% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1258 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 61.5% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than GPT-4.5?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.9 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-4.5 better for coding?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.3 versus 42.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-4.5 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 32 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.5 has 42.