Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemma 2B

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.9 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

61.9

Rank #10 Confirmed

Gemma 2B Google

29.6

Rank #307 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Gemma 2B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 87.9 to 30.0.
  • Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemma 2B specifications
Claude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 2B
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index61.929.6
Released2026-09-282024-02-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked3223

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 67.3 (#6), Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 2B
LMArena Coding15131010
FrontierCode52.1%—
CursorBench55.5%—
LMArena WebDev1774—
FrontierSWE61.9%—
SciCode61%—
ALE-Bench1,819—
HumanEval+—20.7%
MBPP+—34.1%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.0 (#16), Gemma 2B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 2B
APEX-Agents75.5%—

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 54.0 (#28), Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 2B
LMArena Hard Prompts1495989
Epoch Capabilities Index165.0394.2
NYT Connections (extended)80.5%—
CritPt31.4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles65%—
BIG-Bench Hard—35.2%
HellaSwag—71.4%
PIQA—77.3%
WinoGrande—65.4%

Math Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 87.9 (#6), Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 2B
LMArena Math15101009
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)88.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 480.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
FrontierMath Erdős2.9%—
GSM8K—17.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#12), Gemma 2B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 2B
GPQA Diamond95.6%—
SimpleQA Verified46.5%—
LMArena Expert1540—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—42.1%
BoolQ—69.4%
MMLU—42.3%
TriviaQA—53.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 51.5 (#6), Gemma 2B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 2B
LMArena Vision1289—
Furniture Assembly75%—

Multilingual Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 55.3 (#30), Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 2B
LMArena Non-English1452958
LMArena Chinese1522986
LMArena Russian1451937

Instruction Following Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 78.3 (#11), Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 2B
LMArena Instruction Following1495970

Long Context Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.9 (#28), Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 2B
LMArena Longer Query1498981

Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#40), Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 2B
LMArena Text14711002
LMArena Creative Writing1465987
LMArena Multi-Turn1474945

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Gemma 2B?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.9 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Gemma 2B better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.3 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemma 2B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 32 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper