Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Dolly 2.0-12b

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

60.5

Rank #10 Confirmed

Dolly 2.0-12b Databricks

24.9

Rank #339 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 88.7 to 25.0.
  • Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Dolly 2.0-12b specifications
Claude Sonnet 5.5Dolly 2.0-12b
ProviderAnthropicDatabricks
Noometry Index60.524.9
Released2026-09-282023-04-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked1617

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 65.5 (#6), Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.0 (#327)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Dolly 2.0-12b
FrontierCode52.1%—
CursorBench55.5%—
LMArena WebDev1699—
FrontierSWE61.9%—
SciCode61%—
LMArena Coding—776
ALE-Bench1,819—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 44.9 (#14), Dolly 2.0-12b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Dolly 2.0-12b
APEX-Agents75.5%—

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 52.4 (#29), Dolly 2.0-12b: 14.6 (#315)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Dolly 2.0-12b
CritPt31.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—804
Mystery Game Puzzles65%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—88.94
HellaSwag—70.8%
PIQA—75.4%
WinoGrande—61.8%

Math Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 88.7 (#4), Dolly 2.0-12b: 25.0 (#250)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Dolly 2.0-12b
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)88.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 480.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
LMArena Math—871

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#11), Dolly 2.0-12b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Dolly 2.0-12b
GPQA Diamond95.6%—
SimpleQA Verified46.5%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—39.6%
BoolQ—56.3%
MMLU—26.2%
OpenBookQA—39.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 53.2 (#5), Dolly 2.0-12b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Dolly 2.0-12b
Furniture Assembly75%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#291)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Dolly 2.0-12b
LMArena Non-English—836
LMArena Chinese—836

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.9 (#299)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Dolly 2.0-12b
LMArena Instruction Following—814

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#306)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Dolly 2.0-12b
LMArena Text—851
LMArena Creative Writing—864
LMArena Multi-Turn—740

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Dolly 2.0-12b?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Dolly 2.0-12b better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 65.5 versus 23.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Dolly 2.0-12b share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Dolly 2.0-12b has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper