Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Command R7B

Claude Sonnet 5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#10); Command R7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

61.9

Rank #10 Confirmed

Command R7B Cohere

32.5

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 45.0 to 26.1.
  • Command R7B is cheaper at $0.0375 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for Claude Sonnet 5.5.
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
  • Command R7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5Command R7B
ProviderAnthropicCohere
Noometry Index61.932.5
Released2026-09-282024-12-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M128K
Max output128K4K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.0375
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.15
Results tracked321

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 67.3 (#6), Command R7B: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Command R7B
FrontierCode52.1%—
CursorBench55.5%—
LMArena WebDev1774—
FrontierSWE61.9%—
SciCode61%—
LMArena Coding1513—
ALE-Bench1,819—

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.0 (#16), Command R7B: 26.1

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Command R7B
APEX-Agents75.5%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—32.1%

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 54.0 (#28), Command R7B: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Command R7B
NYT Connections (extended)80.5%—
CritPt31.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1495—
Mystery Game Puzzles65%—
Epoch Capabilities Index165.03—

Math Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 87.9 (#6), Command R7B: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Command R7B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)88.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 480.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
LMArena Math1510—
FrontierMath Erdős2.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#12), Command R7B: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Command R7B
GPQA Diamond95.6%—
SimpleQA Verified46.5%—
LMArena Expert1540—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 51.5 (#6), Command R7B: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Command R7B
LMArena Vision1289—
Furniture Assembly75%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 55.3 (#30), Command R7B: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Command R7B
LMArena Non-English1452—
LMArena Chinese1522—
LMArena Russian1451—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 78.3 (#11), Command R7B: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Command R7B
LMArena Instruction Following1495—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.9 (#28), Command R7B: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Command R7B
LMArena Longer Query1498—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#40), Command R7B: —

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Command R7B
LMArena Text1471—
LMArena Creative Writing1465—
LMArena Multi-Turn1474—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Command R7B?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#10); Command R7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Command R7B?

Command R7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.0375 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5 lists at $2 and $10.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Command R7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 32 scored results on Noometry and Command R7B has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper