Model comparison
Claude Sonnet 4 vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
Claude Sonnet 4 and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.8 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 4 scores higher in 4 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 41.6 to 33.7.
Side by side
| Claude Sonnet 4 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2025-05-22 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 64K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $15 | — |
| Results tracked | 58 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Sonnet 4 leads
Claude Sonnet 4: 43.5 (#88), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1414 | 1361 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 64.9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 61.3% | — |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| GSO | 4.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 46.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 655.35 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 4: 38.5 (#31), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 33.1% | — |
| Cybench | 35% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 46.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 43.9% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 62% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Claude Sonnet 4: 22.9 (#187), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1372 | 1374 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 5.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 45.5% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 73% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 40% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3.1% | — |
| DTBench | 77.1% | — |
| LMCA | 29% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.69 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.2 | — |
Math Claude Sonnet 4 leads
Claude Sonnet 4: 43.3 (#80), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1375 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 60.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 84.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Claude Sonnet 4 leads
Claude Sonnet 4: 41.8 (#108), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1372 | 1339 |
| GPQA Diamond | 79.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 7.8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 84.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 70.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 4: 26.2 (#121), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1191 | — |
| GeoBench | 37% | — |
| VPCT | 34% | — |
| MindCube | 44.8% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Claude Sonnet 4: 46.7 (#156), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1333 | 1363 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1350 | 1417 |
| LMArena French | 1363 | 1391 |
| LMArena German | 1331 | 1355 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1302 | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | 1291 | 1351 |
| LMArena Russian | 1355 | 1368 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1357 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Claude Sonnet 4: 71.7 (#145), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1376 | 1344 |
| IFEval | 84% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Claude Sonnet 4: 33.7 (#259), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1398 | 1366 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 46.9% | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Claude Sonnet 4: 57.1 (#132), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1345 | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1376 | 1387 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.4% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1483 | — |
| WildBench | 83.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 4 better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?
Claude Sonnet 4 and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.8 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Claude Sonnet 4 or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?
Claude Sonnet 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 4 and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 4 has 58 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.