Model comparison
Claude Sonnet 4 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 4 scores higher in 3 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 43.9 to 22.9.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper at $1.25 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $15 for Claude Sonnet 4.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| Claude Sonnet 4 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 46.2 |
| Released | 2025-05-22 | 2026-03-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Max output | 64K | 30K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $3 | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $15 | $2.50 |
| Results tracked | 58 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Claude Sonnet 4: 43.5 (#88), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1414 | 1457 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 64.9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 61.3% | — |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| GSO | 4.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 46.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 655.35 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 4: 38.5 (#31), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 33.1% | — |
| Cybench | 35% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 46.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 43.9% | — |
| LMArena Search | — | 1204 |
| METR Time Horizons | 62% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Claude Sonnet 4: 22.9 (#187), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1372 | 1448 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 5.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 45.5% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 73% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 89.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 40% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3.1% | — |
| DTBench | 77.1% | — |
| LMCA | 29% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.69 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.2 | — |
Math Claude Sonnet 4 leads
Claude Sonnet 4: 43.3 (#80), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1375 | 1442 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 60.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 84.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Claude Sonnet 4 leads
Claude Sonnet 4: 41.8 (#108), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1372 | 1445 |
| GPQA Diamond | 79.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 7.8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 84.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 70.6% | — |
Multimodal Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Claude Sonnet 4: 26.2 (#121), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1191 | 1259 |
| GeoBench | 37% | — |
| VPCT | 34% | — |
| MindCube | 44.8% | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Claude Sonnet 4: 46.7 (#156), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1333 | 1440 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1350 | 1475 |
| LMArena French | 1363 | 1466 |
| LMArena German | 1331 | 1456 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1302 | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | 1291 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1355 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1357 | 1447 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Claude Sonnet 4: 71.7 (#145), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1376 | 1420 |
| IFEval | 84% | — |
Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Claude Sonnet 4: 33.7 (#259), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1398 | 1431 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 46.9% | — |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Claude Sonnet 4: 57.1 (#132), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1450 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1345 | 1436 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1376 | 1452 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.4% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1483 | — |
| WildBench | 83.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 4 better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 4 lists at $3 and $15.
Is Claude Sonnet 4 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (43.5 vs 43.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent does, with 1M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 4 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 4 has 58 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.