Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Claude Sonnet 4 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.8 vs 41.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 30 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 4 Anthropic

40.8

Rank #145 Confirmed

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google

41.5

Rank #133 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 30 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 4 scores higher in 3 categories and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite in 7 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 4 leads 43.3 to 25.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-1: 40% for Claude Sonnet 4 and 53.5% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
  • Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.30 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $15 for Claude Sonnet 4.
  • Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 4 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite specifications
Claude Sonnet 4Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index40.841.5
Released2025-05-222026-07-21
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K1.05M
Max output64K66K
Input $ / M tokens$3$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$15$2.50
Results tracked5839

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 4 leads

Claude Sonnet 4: 43.5 (#88), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
SciCode40%41.3%
WeirdML46.1%39%
LMArena Coding14141453
ALE-Bench655.35765.27
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)64.9%—
Aider Polyglot61.3%—
LMArena WebDev—1440
GSO4.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Sonnet 4 leads

Claude Sonnet 4: 38.5 (#31), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
APEX-Agents—29.3%
TheAgentCompany33.1%—
Cybench35%—
DeepResearch Bench46.6%—
OSWorld43.9%—
GDP.pdf—10%
METR Time Horizons62%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Claude Sonnet 4: 22.9 (#187), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ARC-AGI-25.9%10.3%
ARC-AGI-140%53.5%
CritPt0.3%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts13721441
DTBench77.1%83.5%
LMCA29%37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index141.69145.13
SimpleBench45.5%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark73%—
NYT Connections (extended)—60.4%
Chess Puzzles—22%
EnigmaEval3.1%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
ForecastBench60.2—

Math Claude Sonnet 4 leads

Claude Sonnet 4: 43.3 (#80), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202571.1%71.1%
LMArena Math13751433
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—26%
FrontierMath Tier 4—0%
ProofBench—13%
Omni-MATH60.2%—
MATH Level 584.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)4.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Claude Sonnet 4: 41.8 (#108), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
GPQA Diamond79.2%83.3%
LMArena Expert13721435
Humanity's Last Exam7.8%—
MMLU-Pro84.3%—
Confabulations13.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.3%—
GPQA (HELM)70.6%—

Multimodal Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Claude Sonnet 4: 26.2 (#121), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision11911268
GeoBench37%—
VPCT34%—
MindCube44.8%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Claude Sonnet 4: 46.7 (#156), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Non-English13331427
LMArena Chinese13501469
LMArena French13631451
LMArena German13311454
LMArena Japanese13021427
LMArena Korean12911407
LMArena Russian13551443
LMArena Spanish13571442

Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Claude Sonnet 4: 71.7 (#145), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Instruction Following13761420
IFEval84%—

Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Claude Sonnet 4: 33.7 (#259), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Longer Query13981435
Fiction.LiveBench46.9%—

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Claude Sonnet 4: 57.1 (#132), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text13511435
LMArena Creative Writing13451420
EQ-Bench Creative Writing14831559
LMArena Multi-Turn13761445
Short-Story Creative Writing81.4%—
WildBench83.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4 better than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?

Claude Sonnet 4 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.8 vs 41.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4 or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 4 lists at $3 and $15.

Is Claude Sonnet 4 or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 4 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite share?

30 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 4 has 58 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper