Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Mistral 7B

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index. Mistral 7B costs 24× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 4.6's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic

50.3

Rank #50 Confirmed

Mistral 7B Mistral AI

23.0

Rank #351 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral 7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads 52.9 to 8.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 85.8% for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and 0.3% for Mistral 7B.
  • Mistral 7B is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $15 for Claude Sonnet 4.6.
  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 8K.
  • Mistral 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Mistral 7B specifications
Claude Sonnet 4.6Mistral 7B
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
Noometry Index50.323.0
Released2026-02-172023-09-27
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M8K
Max output128K8K
Input $ / M tokens$3$0.25
Output $ / M tokens$15$0.25
Results tracked5737

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 46.3 (#67), Mistral 7B: 26.4 (#326)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Mistral 7B
LMArena Coding15041082
SWE-bench Verified75.2%—
DeepSWE29.9%—
FrontierCode24.3%—
LMArena WebDev1522—
SciCode46.8%—
WeirdML66.1%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—19.5%
BigCodeBench Complete—27.3%
ALE-Bench1,327—
HumanEval+—36%
MBPP+—42.1%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 39.1 (#28), Mistral 7B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Mistral 7B
Terminal-Bench53.4%—
APEX-Agents43%—
OSWorld 2.09.3%—
DeepResearch Bench54.9%—
OSWorld72.1%—
ExploitBench23.6%—
GBAEval48.8%—
GDP.pdf18%—
LMArena Search1221—
Vending-Bench 27,204—

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 46.1 (#45), Mistral 7B: 13.1 (#336)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Mistral 7B
Chess Puzzles13%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts14841067
DTBench89.9%42.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index152.24112.21
ARC-AGI-260.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)80.9%—
ARC-AGI-186.5%—
CritPt3.1%—
Thematic Generalization76.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles16%—
LMCA46.5%—
Adversarial NLI—47.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—56.1%
ForecastBench62—
HellaSwag—81%
PIQA—83%
WinoGrande—75.3%

Math Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 52.9 (#49), Mistral 7B: 8.1 (#325)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Mistral 7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202585.8%0.3%
LMArena Math14621085
ProofBench45%—
MATH Level 5—3.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)32.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)8.3%—
GSM8K—54.4%

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 51.7 (#65), Mistral 7B: 7.4 (#311)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Mistral 7B
GPQA Diamond87.4%15.2%
LMArena Expert15001036
SimpleQA Verified35.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.6%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—78.6%
BoolQ—87.4%
MMLU—62.5%
OpenBookQA—79.8%
TriviaQA—75.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 38.0 (#68), Mistral 7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Mistral 7B
LMArena Vision1283—
Blueprint-Bench 26.7%—
LMArena Document1482—

Multilingual Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 54.4 (#41), Mistral 7B: 25.8 (#283)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Mistral 7B
LMArena Non-English14401012
LMArena Chinese14911009
LMArena French14651037
LMArena German1428987
LMArena Japanese1420878
LMArena Russian14401018
LMArena Spanish14641026
LMArena Korean1411—

Instruction Following Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 77.4 (#25), Mistral 7B: 54.2 (#280)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Mistral 7B
LMArena Instruction Following14751060

Long Context Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 45.3 (#44), Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#271)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Mistral 7B
LMArena Longer Query14791060

Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 70.2 (#22), Mistral 7B: 30.7 (#286)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Mistral 7B
LMArena Text14581090
LMArena Creative Writing14351068
LMArena Multi-Turn14641062
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1810—
EQ-Bench 41207—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than Mistral 7B?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index. Mistral 7B costs 24× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 4.6's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Mistral 7B?

Mistral 7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 4.6 lists at $3 and $15.

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Mistral 7B better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.3 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 does, with 1M tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Mistral 7B share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has 57 scored results on Noometry and Mistral 7B has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper