Model comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Grok 4 Fast
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.1 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 26 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 26 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher in 8 categories and Grok 4 Fast in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads 46.1 to 22.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-2: 60.4% for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and 5.3% for Grok 4 Fast.
Side by side
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Grok 4 Fast | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 50.1 | 39.0 |
| Released | 2026-02-17 | 2025-09-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $15 | — |
| Results tracked | 57 | 30 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.6: 46.0 (#62), Grok 4 Fast: 32.3 (#264)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1521 | 1160 |
| WeirdML | 66.1% | 42.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | 1429 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.2% | — |
| DeepSWE | 29.9% | — |
| FrontierCode | 24.3% | — |
| SciCode | 46.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,327 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.6: 39.1 (#26), Grok 4 Fast: 29.3 (#80)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1221 | 1171 |
| Terminal-Bench | 53.4% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 43% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 9.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 15.7% |
| Cybench | — | 30% |
| DeepResearch Bench | 54.9% | — |
| OSWorld | 72.1% | — |
| ExploitBench | 23.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 48.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 18% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 7,204 | — |
Reasoning Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.6: 46.1 (#40), Grok 4 Fast: 22.5 (#179)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 60.4% | 5.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 86.5% | 48.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1485 | 1413 |
| DTBench | 89.9% | 82.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.25 | 144.21 |
| ForecastBench | 62 | 60.5 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 66.1% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 80.9% | — |
| CritPt | 3.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 13% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 76.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 16% | — |
| LMCA | 46.5% | — |
Math Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.6: 51.9 (#41), Grok 4 Fast: 36.1 (#126)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1463 | 1419 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 85.8% | — |
| ProofBench | 45% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 32.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 8.3% | — |
Knowledge Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.6: 51.6 (#60), Grok 4 Fast: 31.5 (#211)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.6% | 19.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1500 | 1411 |
| GPQA Diamond | 87.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 35.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 4.6: 38.0 (#61), Grok 4 Fast: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1283 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 6.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1482 | — |
Multilingual Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.6: 54.6 (#39), Grok 4 Fast: 51.5 (#106)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1440 | 1397 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1491 | 1458 |
| LMArena French | 1465 | 1433 |
| LMArena German | 1428 | 1383 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1419 | 1358 |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | 1359 |
| LMArena Russian | 1440 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1465 | 1414 |
Instruction Following Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.6: 77.6 (#23), Grok 4 Fast: 73.4 (#116)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1476 | 1388 |
Long Context Grok 4 Fast leads
Claude Sonnet 4.6: 45.3 (#40), Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1479 | 1415 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 94.4% |
Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.6: 70.4 (#22), Grok 4 Fast: 60.2 (#96)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1407 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1435 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1464 | 1414 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1810 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1207 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than Grok 4 Fast?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.1 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Grok 4 Fast better for coding?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.0 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Grok 4 Fast share?
26 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has 57 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 Fast has 30.