Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Step 3

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Anthropic

44.1

Rank #81 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

40.5

Rank #149 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Step 3 in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads 66.5 to 54.3.
  • Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Step 3 specifications
Claude Sonnet 4.5Step 3
ProviderAnthropicStepFun
Noometry Index44.140.5
Released2025-09-29—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output64K—
Input $ / M tokens$3—
Output $ / M tokens$15—
Results tracked7317

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 47.3 (#61), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Step 3
LMArena Coding14891367
SWE-bench Verified71.3%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)71.4%—
LMArena WebDev1393—
SWE-bench Multilingual67%—
SciCode44.7%—
GSO14.7%—
WeirdML47.7%—
ALE-Bench796.15—
AlgoTune1.52—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 38.3 (#32), Step 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Step 3
Terminal-Bench46.5%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard73.2%—
GDPval42.5%—
Remote Labor Index2.1%—
τ²-bench Airline72%—
τ²-bench Banking25.3%—
τ²-bench Retail72.4%—
τ²-bench Telecom84.9%—
Cybench60%—
DeepResearch Bench52.6%—
OSWorld62.9%—
LMArena Search1159—
METR Time Horizons67.4%—
Vending-Bench 23,839—

Reasoning Step 3 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 26.9 (#125), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Step 3
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.9%62.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts14621355
ARC-AGI-213.6%—
SimpleBench54.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)37.3%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
CritPt1.1%—
Chess Puzzles12%—
EnigmaEval6%—
EBR-Bench2.4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles17%—
DTBench83.2%—
LMCA38.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.84—
ForecastBench61.9—

Math Step 3 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 32.3 (#216), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Step 3
LMArena Math14491366
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)23.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 42.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202577.8%—
ProofBench19%—
Omni-MATH55.3%—
MATH Level 597.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)15.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 48.4 (#76), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Step 3
LMArena Expert14821333
GPQA Diamond82.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam13.7%—
SimpleQA Verified30.7%—
MMLU-Pro86.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate12%—
GPQA (HELM)68.6%—

Multimodal Too close to call

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 34.8 (#89), Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Step 3
LMArena Vision—1177
VPCT39.8%—
LMArena Document1450—

Multilingual Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 53.4 (#69), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Step 3
LMArena Non-English14251327
LMArena Chinese14591397
LMArena German14271371
LMArena Korean14031269
LMArena Russian14371331
LMArena Spanish14571371
LMArena French1458—
LMArena Japanese1390—

Instruction Following Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 75.0 (#78), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Step 3
LMArena Instruction Following14591332
IFEval85%—

Long Context Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 45.2 (#46), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Step 3
LMArena Longer Query14761326

Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 66.5 (#34), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Step 3
LMArena Text14391350
LMArena Creative Writing14421321
LMArena Multi-Turn14651341
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1678—
WildBench85.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than Step 3?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Step 3 better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.3 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Step 3 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 4.5 has 73 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper