Model comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-6 Sol
GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 44.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 38 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 38 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher in 4 categories and GPT-6 Sol in 6 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Sol leads 87.2 to 32.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath Tier 4: 2.4% for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and 90% for GPT-6 Sol.
- GPT-6 Sol is cheaper at $2 / $10 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $15 for Claude Sonnet 4.5.
- GPT-6 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | GPT-6 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 44.1 | 61.8 |
| Released | 2025-09-29 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 64K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $3 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $15 | $10 |
| Results tracked | 73 | 45 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6 Sol leads
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 47.3 (#61), GPT-6 Sol: 60.1 (#11)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1393 | 1688 |
| SciCode | 44.7% | 57.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1489 | 1447 |
| ALE-Bench | 796.15 | 2,462 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 71.3% | — |
| DeepSWE | — | 68.8% |
| FrontierCode | — | 49.3% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 71.4% | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 67% | — |
| GSO | 14.7% | — |
| WeirdML | 47.7% | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.52 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 38.3 (#32), GPT-6 Sol: 37.2 (#36)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,839 | 14,428 |
| Terminal-Bench | 46.5% | — |
| APEX-Agents | — | 54.3% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 73.2% | — |
| GDPval | 42.5% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 2.1% | — |
| τ²-bench Airline | 72% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 25.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Retail | 72.4% | — |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 84.9% | — |
| Cybench | 60% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 52.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 62.9% | — |
| GDP.pdf | — | 26.4% |
| LMArena Search | 1159 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 67.4% | — |
Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 26.9 (#125), GPT-6 Sol: 74.0 (#9)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 13.6% | 89.6% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 37.3% | 90.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 63.7% | 95.5% |
| CritPt | 1.1% | 30.9% |
| EBR-Bench | 2.4% | 53.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1462 | 1418 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 17% | 56% |
| DTBench | 83.2% | 97.3% |
| LMCA | 38.8% | 59.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.84 | 162.72 |
| SimpleBench | 54.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 12% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 6% | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.9 | — |
Math GPT-6 Sol leads
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 32.3 (#216), GPT-6 Sol: 87.2 (#7)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 23.9% | 89.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | 90% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 77.8% | 100% |
| ProofBench | 19% | 83% |
| LMArena Math | 1449 | 1402 |
| Omni-MATH | 55.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 97.7% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 15.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge GPT-6 Sol leads
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 48.4 (#76), GPT-6 Sol: 64.8 (#15)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 82.3% | 94.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 30.7% | 60.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12% | 6.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1482 | 1439 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 13.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 68.6% | — |
Multimodal GPT-6 Sol leads
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 34.8 (#89), GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#10)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1245 |
| VPCT | 39.8% | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 36.9% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 58.3% |
| LMArena Document | 1450 | — |
Multilingual Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 53.4 (#69), GPT-6 Sol: 50.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1459 | 1405 |
| LMArena French | 1458 | 1410 |
| LMArena German | 1427 | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1390 | 1385 |
| LMArena Korean | 1403 | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | 1437 | 1401 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1457 | 1384 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 75.0 (#78), GPT-6 Sol: 74.5 (#94)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1459 | 1412 |
| IFEval | 85% | — |
Long Context Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 45.2 (#46), GPT-6 Sol: 43.1 (#108)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1476 | 1411 |
Writing & Preference GPT-6 Sol leads
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 66.5 (#34), GPT-6 Sol: 71.9 (#18)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | 1395 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1442 | 1378 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1678 | 2125 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1465 | 1412 |
| WildBench | 85.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than GPT-6 Sol?
GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 44.1 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-6 Sol?
GPT-6 Sol is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 4.5 lists at $3 and $15.
Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-6 Sol better for coding?
GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 60.1 versus 47.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-6 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-6 Sol share?
38 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 4.5 has 73 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Sol has 45.