Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6

Claude Opus 5 has enough public results to be ranked (#4); Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 5 Anthropic

67.8

Rank #4 Confirmed

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Google

32.9

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Opus 5 scores higher in 1 category and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multimodal, where Claude Opus 5 leads 50.8 to 26.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Blueprint-Bench 2: 30.4% for Claude Opus 5 and 0% for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6.

Side by side

Claude Opus 5Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index67.832.9
Released2026-07-242026-04-14
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$5—
Output $ / M tokens$25—
Results tracked571

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 67.5 (#5), Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
DeepSWE73.6%—
FrontierCode53.4%—
CursorBench46.6%—
LMArena WebDev1691—
FrontierSWE52%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML91.8%—
LMArena Coding1534—
ALE-Bench2,165—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 55.6 (#1), Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
APEX-Agents65.8%—
OSWorld 2.031.4%—
τ²-bench Banking48.7%—
PostTrainBench35%—
BALROG63.4%—
GBAEval79.6%—
GDP.pdf24%—
Vending-Bench 211,182—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 77.2 (#4), Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
ARC-AGI-290.4%—
SimpleBench80.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94.3%—
ARC-AGI-197.5%—
CritPt29.1%—
Chess Puzzles42%—
EBR-Bench45.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1526—
Mystery Game Puzzles59%—
DTBench97.9%—
LMCA64.5%—
Bench to the Future 30.12—
Epoch Capabilities Index162.78—

Math Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 86.2 (#8), Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)85.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 473.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
ProofBench99%—
LMArena Math1531—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 66.8 (#9), Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
GPQA Diamond93.9%—
SimpleQA Verified59.9%—
LMArena Expert1557—

Multimodal Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 50.8 (#8), Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: 26.8

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
Blueprint-Bench 230.4%0%
LMArena Vision1319—
Furniture Assembly60.8%—
LMArena Document1516—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 58.8 (#4), Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
LMArena Non-English1501—
LMArena Chinese1574—
LMArena French1519—
LMArena German1524—
LMArena Japanese1516—
LMArena Korean1521—
LMArena Russian1507—
LMArena Spanish1519—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 79.2 (#7), Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
LMArena Instruction Following1517—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 46.5 (#21), Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
LMArena Longer Query1515—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 79.2 (#1), Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
LMArena Text1507—
LMArena Creative Writing1491—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2133—
EQ-Bench 41385—
LMArena Multi-Turn1499—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 5 better than Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6?

Claude Opus 5 has enough public results to be ranked (#4); Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 5 and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Opus 5 has 57 scored results on Noometry and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper