Model comparison
Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 4 Argon
Claude Opus 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 67.8 to 56.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 5 scores higher in 7 categories and Gemini 4 Argon in 3 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Opus 5 leads 77.2 to 44.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Blueprint-Bench 2: 30.4% for Claude Opus 5 and 54.4% for Gemini 4 Argon.
Side by side
| Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 4 Argon | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 67.8 | 56.5 |
| Released | 2026-07-24 | 2026-09-30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $5 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $25 | — |
| Results tracked | 57 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 67.5 (#5), Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1691 | 1678 |
| FrontierSWE | 52% | 55% |
| SciCode | 56.4% | 61.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1534 | 1550 |
| DeepSWE | 73.6% | — |
| FrontierCode | 53.4% | — |
| CursorBench | 46.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 91.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 2,165 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 55.6 (#1), Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 65.8% | 82.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 11,182 | 13,718 |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 31.4% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 48.7% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 35% | — |
| BALROG | 63.4% | — |
| GBAEval | 79.6% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 24% | — |
Reasoning Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 77.2 (#4), Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 29.1% | 27.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1526 | 1548 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 90.4% | — |
| SimpleBench | 80.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 94.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 97.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 42% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 45.7% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 59% | — |
| DTBench | 97.9% | — |
| LMCA | 64.5% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.12 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 162.78 | — |
Math Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 86.2 (#8), Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 99% | 99% |
| LMArena Math | 1531 | 1536 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 85.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 73.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
Knowledge Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 66.8 (#9), Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1557 | 1553 |
| GPQA Diamond | 93.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 59.9% | — |
Multimodal Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 50.8 (#8), Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 30.4% | 54.4% |
| LMArena Vision | 1319 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 60.8% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1516 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude Opus 5: 58.8 (#4), Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1501 | 1523 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1574 | 1610 |
| LMArena Russian | 1507 | 1537 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1519 | 1497 |
| LMArena French | 1519 | — |
| LMArena German | 1524 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1516 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1521 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Claude Opus 5: 79.2 (#7), Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1517 | 1538 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude Opus 5: 46.5 (#21), Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1515 | 1549 |
Writing & Preference Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 79.2 (#1), Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1507 | 1534 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1491 | 1531 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1499 | 1557 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2133 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1385 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Opus 5 better than Gemini 4 Argon?
Claude Opus 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 67.8 to 56.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Opus 5 or Gemini 4 Argon better for coding?
Claude Opus 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.5 versus 62.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 5 and Gemini 4 Argon share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 5 has 57 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 4 Argon has 21.