Model comparison

Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision

Claude Opus 5 has enough public results to be ranked (#4); Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 5 Anthropic

67.7

Rank #4 Confirmed

Side by side

Claude Opus 5 and Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision specifications
Claude Opus 5Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index67.7—
Released2026-07-242024-01-04
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$5—
Output $ / M tokens$25—
Results tracked571

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 67.0 (#5), Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision
DeepSWE73.6%—
FrontierCode53.4%—
CursorBench46.6%—
LMArena WebDev1694—
FrontierSWE52%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML91.8%—
LMArena Coding1533—
ALE-Bench2,165—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 55.5 (#1), Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision
APEX-Agents65.8%—
OSWorld 2.031.4%—
τ²-bench Banking48.7%—
PostTrainBench35%—
BALROG63.4%—
GBAEval79.6%—
GDP.pdf24%—
Vending-Bench 211,182—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 77.1 (#3), Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision
ARC-AGI-290.4%—
SimpleBench80.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94.3%—
ARC-AGI-197.5%—
CritPt29.1%—
Chess Puzzles42%—
EBR-Bench45.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1525—
Mystery Game Puzzles59%—
DTBench97.9%—
LMCA64.5%—
Bench to the Future 30.12—
Epoch Capabilities Index162.67—

Math Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 86.1 (#6), Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)85.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 473.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
ProofBench99%—
LMArena Math1533—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 66.8 (#8), Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision
GPQA Diamond93.9%—
SimpleQA Verified59.9%—
LMArena Expert1558—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 51.1 (#6), Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision
LMArena Vision1321—
Blueprint-Bench 230.4%—
Furniture Assembly60.8%—
LMArena Document1516—
ScienceQA—79.7%

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 58.8 (#3), Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision
LMArena Non-English1500—
LMArena Chinese1575—
LMArena French1522—
LMArena German1522—
LMArena Japanese1510—
LMArena Korean1526—
LMArena Russian1507—
LMArena Spanish1519—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 79.3 (#5), Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision
LMArena Instruction Following1516—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 46.5 (#20), Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision
LMArena Longer Query1516—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 79.3 (#2), Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision
LMArena Text1506—
LMArena Creative Writing1491—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2133—
EQ-Bench 41385—
LMArena Multi-Turn1496—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 5 better than Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision?

Claude Opus 5 has enough public results to be ranked (#4); Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 5 and Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 5 has 57 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper