Model comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Sonar Reasoning Pro

Claude Opus 5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#3); Sonar Reasoning Pro does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic

68.5

Rank #3 Confirmed

Summary

  • Sonar Reasoning Pro is cheaper at $2 / $8 per million input/output tokens, against $4 / $20 for Claude Opus 5.5.
  • Claude Opus 5.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Claude Opus 5.5 and Sonar Reasoning Pro specifications
Claude Opus 5.5Sonar Reasoning Pro
ProviderAnthropicPerplexity
Noometry Index68.5—
Released2026-09-222024-01-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M128K
Max output128K4K
Input $ / M tokens$4$2
Output $ / M tokens$20$8
Results tracked351

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 71.4 (#1), Sonar Reasoning Pro: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Sonar Reasoning Pro
FrontierCode54.4%—
CursorBench57.8%—
LMArena WebDev1820—
FrontierSWE62.3%—
SciCode66.9%—
LMArena Coding1545—
MirrorCode77.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 45.3 (#13), Sonar Reasoning Pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Sonar Reasoning Pro
APEX-Agents73.5%—
GDP.pdf30.6%—
LMArena Search—1139

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 79.5 (#2), Sonar Reasoning Pro: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Sonar Reasoning Pro
ARC-AGI-292.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)88.5%—
ARC-AGI-197.5%—
CritPt31.7%—
EBR-Bench71.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1545—
Mystery Game Puzzles71%—
DTBench98.9%—
LMCA68.2%—

Math Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 92.4 (#2), Sonar Reasoning Pro: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Sonar Reasoning Pro
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)91.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 495%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 66.6 (#9), Sonar Reasoning Pro: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Sonar Reasoning Pro
GPQA Diamond90.6%—
SimpleQA Verified72.2%—
LMArena Expert1564—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 56.5 (#2), Sonar Reasoning Pro: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Sonar Reasoning Pro
Furniture Assembly83.3%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 59.8 (#1), Sonar Reasoning Pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Sonar Reasoning Pro
LMArena Non-English1513—
LMArena Chinese1572—
LMArena Russian1532—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 80.1 (#2), Sonar Reasoning Pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Sonar Reasoning Pro
LMArena Instruction Following1535—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 47.3 (#18), Sonar Reasoning Pro: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Sonar Reasoning Pro
LMArena Longer Query1540—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 78.7 (#3), Sonar Reasoning Pro: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Sonar Reasoning Pro
LMArena Text1518—
LMArena Creative Writing1538—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2050—
LMArena Multi-Turn1520—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than Sonar Reasoning Pro?

Claude Opus 5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#3); Sonar Reasoning Pro does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Sonar Reasoning Pro?

Sonar Reasoning Pro is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $8 per million output tokens; Claude Opus 5.5 lists at $4 and $20.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 5.5 and Sonar Reasoning Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 5.5 has 35 scored results on Noometry and Sonar Reasoning Pro has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper