Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Hunyuan Large Vision

Claude Opus 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.6 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic

68.6

Rank #3 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher in 9 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 5.5 leads 91.8 to 35.5.

Side by side

Claude Opus 5.5Hunyuan Large Vision
ProviderAnthropicTencent
Noometry Index68.637.6
Released2026-09-22—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$4—
Output $ / M tokens$20—
Results tracked4413

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 71.9 (#3), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Coding15471308
FrontierCode54.6%—
CursorBench57.8%—
LMArena WebDev1813—
FrontierSWE62.3%—
SciCode66.9%—
MirrorCode77.4%—
ALE-Bench2,147—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 45.3 (#15), Hunyuan Large Vision: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Hunyuan Large Vision
APEX-Agents73.5%—
GDP.pdf30.6%—
Vending-Bench 29,235—

Reasoning Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 80.2 (#3), Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Hard Prompts15351257
ARC-AGI-293.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)88.5%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt31.7%—
EBR-Bench71.4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles71%—
DTBench98.9%—
LMCA68.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index167.33—

Math Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 91.8 (#3), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Math15061268
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)91.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 495%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
FrontierMath Erdős2.9%—

Knowledge Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 66.4 (#10), Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Expert15471252
GPQA Diamond90.6%—
SimpleQA Verified72.2%—

Multimodal Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 57.8 (#1), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Vision13211180
Blueprint-Bench 251.2%—
Furniture Assembly83.3%—

Multilingual Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 59.1 (#2), Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Non-English15071236
LMArena Chinese15881287
LMArena Russian15201243
LMArena French1514—
LMArena Spanish1507—

Instruction Following Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 80.0 (#3), Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Instruction Following15371251

Long Context Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 47.1 (#19), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Longer Query15321280

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 78.2 (#3), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Text15151263
LMArena Creative Writing15331248
LMArena Multi-Turn14991254
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2050—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than Hunyuan Large Vision?

Claude Opus 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.6 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 5.5 or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?

Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 71.9 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 5.5 and Hunyuan Large Vision share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 5.5 has 44 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper