Model comparison
Claude Opus 4 vs GLM-5V-Turbo
Claude Opus 4 and GLM-5V-Turbo score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.9 vs 43.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4 scores higher in 4 categories and GLM-5V-Turbo in 5 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multimodal, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 40.1 to 30.9.
- GLM-5V-Turbo is cheaper at $1.20 / $4 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $75 for Claude Opus 4.
Side by side
| Claude Opus 4 | GLM-5V-Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2025-05-22 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | 200K |
| Max output | 32K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $75 | $4 |
| Results tracked | 56 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Opus 4 leads
Claude Opus 4: 47.8 (#55), GLM-5V-Turbo: 41.8 (#105)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1442 | 1467 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 70.7% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 67.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 72% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1400 |
| GSO | 6.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 43.7% | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.33 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Opus 4: 34.5 (#39), GLM-5V-Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 38% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 46.8% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1127 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 63.9% | — |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Claude Opus 4: 27.4 (#104), GLM-5V-Turbo: 28.5 (#87)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1443 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 8.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | 58.8% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 74.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 35.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| DTBench | 81.6% | — |
| LMCA | 37.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.67 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.1 | — |
Math Claude Opus 4 leads
Claude Opus 4: 40.2 (#80), GLM-5V-Turbo: 36.6 (#109)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1391 | 1440 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 64.4% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 61.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 85% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Claude Opus 4 leads
Claude Opus 4: 43.9 (#82), GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.9 (#113)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1384 | 1451 |
| GPQA Diamond | 76.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 10.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 87.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 15.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 70.8% | — |
Multimodal GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Claude Opus 4: 30.9 (#101), GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.1 (#41)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1192 | 1264 |
| GeoBench | 49% | — |
| VPCT | 38% | — |
| LMArena Document | — | 1416 |
Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Claude Opus 4: 49.0 (#133), GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.2 (#69)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1362 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1386 | 1488 |
| LMArena French | 1370 | 1443 |
| LMArena German | 1391 | 1422 |
| LMArena Korean | 1318 | 1399 |
| LMArena Russian | 1392 | 1432 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1388 | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1332 | — |
Instruction Following Claude Opus 4 leads
Claude Opus 4: 77.3 (#26), GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.1 (#75)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1422 |
| IFEval | 91.8% | — |
Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Claude Opus 4: 39.5 (#167), GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#76)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1439 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Claude Opus 4: 61.4 (#85), GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.6 (#69)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1386 | 1414 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1396 | 1432 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.6% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1580 | — |
| WildBench | 85.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Opus 4 better than GLM-5V-Turbo?
Claude Opus 4 and GLM-5V-Turbo score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.9 vs 43.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4 or GLM-5V-Turbo?
GLM-5V-Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $1.20 per million input tokens and $4 per million output tokens; Claude Opus 4 lists at $15 and $75.
Is Claude Opus 4 or GLM-5V-Turbo better for coding?
Claude Opus 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.8 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 200K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4 and GLM-5V-Turbo share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4 has 56 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5V-Turbo has 19.