Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4 vs Gemma 1.1 7b IT

Claude Opus 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4 Anthropic

43.1

Rank #100 Confirmed

Gemma 1.1 7b IT Google

31.3

Rank #277 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 1.1 7b IT in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude Opus 4 leads 61.2 to 30.4.
  • Gemma 1.1 7b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4Gemma 1.1 7b IT
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index43.131.3
Released2025-05-22—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output32K—
Input $ / M tokens$15—
Output $ / M tokens$75—
Results tracked5619

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 47.2 (#62), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Coding14421084
SWE-bench Verified70.7%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)67.6%—
Aider Polyglot72%—
GSO6.9%—
WeirdML43.7%—
AlgoTune1.33—
HumanEval+—35.4%
MBPP+—45%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 4: 34.8 (#42), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Gemma 1.1 7b IT
Cybench38%—
DeepResearch Bench46.8%—
LMArena Search1127—
METR Time Horizons63.9%—

Reasoning Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 27.3 (#121), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Hard Prompts13991071
ARC-AGI-28.6%—
SimpleBench58.8%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark74.3%—
ARC-AGI-135.7%—
CritPt0.3%—
EnigmaEval5.6%—
DTBench81.6%—
LMCA37.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.67—
ForecastBench61.1—

Math Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 42.0 (#86), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Math13901107
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202564.4%—
Omni-MATH61.6%—
MATH Level 585%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)4.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 44.0 (#88), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Expert13861039
GPQA Diamond76.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam10.7%—
MMLU-Pro87.5%—
Confabulations15.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate12%—
GPQA (HELM)70.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 4: 31.5 (#106), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Vision1192—
GeoBench49%—
VPCT38%—

Multilingual Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 48.8 (#138), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Non-English13621052
LMArena Chinese13861061
LMArena French13721065
LMArena German13911054
LMArena Japanese1331971
LMArena Korean1321988
LMArena Russian13921046
LMArena Spanish13891049

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 77.1 (#28), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Instruction Following14061057
IFEval91.8%—

Long Context Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 39.6 (#172), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Longer Query14221056
Fiction.LiveBench61.1%—

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 61.2 (#89), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Text13771094
LMArena Creative Writing13871060
LMArena Multi-Turn13961040
Short-Story Creative Writing83.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1580—
WildBench85.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4 better than Gemma 1.1 7b IT?

Claude Opus 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 4 or Gemma 1.1 7b IT better for coding?

Claude Opus 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.2 versus 31.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4 and Gemma 1.1 7b IT share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4 has 56 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper