Model comparison
Claude Opus 4 vs Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4 scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 4 Argon in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 42.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 0.3% for Claude Opus 4 and 27.1% for Gemini 4 Argon.
Side by side
| Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 4 Argon | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 56.5 |
| Released | 2025-05-22 | 2026-09-30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 32K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $75 | — |
| Results tracked | 56 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude Opus 4: 47.2 (#62), Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1442 | 1550 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 70.7% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 67.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 72% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1678 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 55% |
| SciCode | — | 61.8% |
| GSO | 6.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 43.7% | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.33 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude Opus 4: 34.8 (#42), Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 82.2% |
| Cybench | 38% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 46.8% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1127 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 63.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 13,718 |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude Opus 4: 27.3 (#121), Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0.3% | 27.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1548 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 8.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | 58.8% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 74.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 35.7% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| DTBench | 81.6% | — |
| LMCA | 37.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.67 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.1 | — |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude Opus 4: 42.0 (#86), Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1390 | 1536 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 64.4% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 99% |
| Omni-MATH | 61.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 85% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Claude Opus 4: 44.0 (#88), Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | 1553 |
| GPQA Diamond | 76.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 10.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 87.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 15.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 70.8% | — |
Multimodal Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude Opus 4: 31.5 (#106), Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1192 | — |
| GeoBench | 49% | — |
| VPCT | 38% | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 54.4% |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude Opus 4: 48.8 (#138), Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1362 | 1523 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1386 | 1610 |
| LMArena Russian | 1392 | 1537 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1389 | 1497 |
| LMArena French | 1372 | — |
| LMArena German | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1321 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude Opus 4: 77.1 (#28), Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1538 |
| IFEval | 91.8% | — |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude Opus 4: 39.6 (#172), Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1549 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude Opus 4: 61.2 (#89), Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1534 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1387 | 1531 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1396 | 1557 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.6% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1580 | — |
| WildBench | 85.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Opus 4 better than Gemini 4 Argon?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Opus 4 or Gemini 4 Argon better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 47.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4 and Gemini 4 Argon share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4 has 56 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 4 Argon has 21.