Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4 vs ERNIE 5.0 0110

Claude Opus 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4 Anthropic

43.1

Rank #100 Confirmed

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4 scores higher in 5 categories and ERNIE 5.0 0110 in 4 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Opus 4 leads 27.3 to 17.0.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4ERNIE 5.0 0110
ProviderAnthropicBaidu
Noometry Index43.141.8
Released2025-05-22—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K—
Max output32K—
Input $ / M tokens$15—
Output $ / M tokens$75—
Results tracked5620

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 47.2 (#62), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Coding14421455
SWE-bench Verified70.7%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)67.6%—
Aider Polyglot72%—
GSO6.9%—
WeirdML43.7%—
AlgoTune1.33—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 4: 34.8 (#42), ERNIE 5.0 0110: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4ERNIE 5.0 0110
Cybench38%—
DeepResearch Bench46.8%—
LMArena Search1127—
METR Time Horizons63.9%—

Reasoning Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 27.3 (#121), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Hard Prompts13991445
ARC-AGI-28.6%—
SimpleBench58.8%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark74.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)—10.3%
ARC-AGI-135.7%—
CritPt0.3%—
EnigmaEval5.6%—
Thematic Generalization—41.7%
DTBench81.6%—
LMCA37.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.67—
ForecastBench61.1—

Math Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 42.0 (#86), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Math13901437
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202564.4%—
Omni-MATH61.6%—
MATH Level 585%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)4.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 44.0 (#88), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Expert13861428
GPQA Diamond76.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam10.7%—
MMLU-Pro87.5%—
Confabulations15.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate12%—
GPQA (HELM)70.8%—

Multimodal ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

Claude Opus 4: 31.5 (#106), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Vision11921249
GeoBench49%—
VPCT38%—

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

Claude Opus 4: 48.8 (#138), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Non-English13621436
LMArena Chinese13861512
LMArena French13721467
LMArena German13911460
LMArena Japanese13311382
LMArena Korean13211406
LMArena Russian13921446
LMArena Spanish13891473

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 77.1 (#28), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Instruction Following14061413
IFEval91.8%—

Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

Claude Opus 4: 39.6 (#172), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Longer Query14221422
Fiction.LiveBench61.1%—

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

Claude Opus 4: 61.2 (#89), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Text13771445
LMArena Creative Writing13871426
LMArena Multi-Turn13961434
Short-Story Creative Writing83.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1580—
WildBench85.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4 better than ERNIE 5.0 0110?

Claude Opus 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 4 or ERNIE 5.0 0110 better for coding?

Claude Opus 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.2 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4 and ERNIE 5.0 0110 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4 has 56 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper