Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4 vs Dolly 2.0-12b

Claude Opus 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4 Anthropic

42.9

Rank #93 Confirmed

Dolly 2.0-12b Databricks

24.9

Rank #339 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4 scores higher in 6 categories and Dolly 2.0-12b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude Opus 4 leads 61.4 to 15.3.
  • Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4Dolly 2.0-12b
ProviderAnthropicDatabricks
Noometry Index42.924.9
Released2025-05-222023-04-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output32K—
Input $ / M tokens$15—
Output $ / M tokens$75—
Results tracked5617

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 47.8 (#55), Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.0 (#327)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Dolly 2.0-12b
LMArena Coding1442776
SWE-bench Verified70.7%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)67.6%—
Aider Polyglot72%—
GSO6.9%—
WeirdML43.7%—
AlgoTune1.33—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 4: 34.5 (#39), Dolly 2.0-12b: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Dolly 2.0-12b
Cybench38%—
DeepResearch Bench46.8%—
LMArena Search1127—
METR Time Horizons63.9%—

Reasoning Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 27.4 (#104), Dolly 2.0-12b: 14.6 (#315)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Dolly 2.0-12b
LMArena Hard Prompts1399804
Epoch Capabilities Index142.6788.94
ARC-AGI-28.6%—
SimpleBench58.8%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark74.3%—
ARC-AGI-135.7%—
CritPt0.3%—
EnigmaEval5.6%—
DTBench81.6%—
LMCA37.4%—
ForecastBench61.1—
HellaSwag—70.8%
PIQA—75.4%
WinoGrande—61.8%

Math Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 40.2 (#80), Dolly 2.0-12b: 25.0 (#250)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Dolly 2.0-12b
LMArena Math1391871
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202564.4%—
Omni-MATH61.6%—
MATH Level 585%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)4.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Opus 4: 43.9 (#82), Dolly 2.0-12b: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Dolly 2.0-12b
GPQA Diamond76.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam10.7%—
MMLU-Pro87.5%—
Confabulations15.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate12%—
GPQA (HELM)70.8%—
LMArena Expert1384—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—39.6%
BoolQ—56.3%
MMLU—26.2%
OpenBookQA—39.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 4: 30.9 (#101), Dolly 2.0-12b: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Dolly 2.0-12b
LMArena Vision1192—
GeoBench49%—
VPCT38%—

Multilingual Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 49.0 (#133), Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#291)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Dolly 2.0-12b
LMArena Non-English1362836
LMArena Chinese1386836
LMArena French1370—
LMArena German1391—
LMArena Japanese1332—
LMArena Korean1318—
LMArena Russian1392—
LMArena Spanish1388—

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 77.3 (#26), Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.9 (#299)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Dolly 2.0-12b
LMArena Instruction Following1406814
IFEval91.8%—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Opus 4: 39.5 (#167), Dolly 2.0-12b: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Dolly 2.0-12b
Fiction.LiveBench61.1%—
LMArena Longer Query1422—

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4 leads

Claude Opus 4: 61.4 (#85), Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#306)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Dolly 2.0-12b
LMArena Text1377851
LMArena Creative Writing1386864
LMArena Multi-Turn1396740
Short-Story Creative Writing83.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1580—
WildBench85.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4 better than Dolly 2.0-12b?

Claude Opus 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 4 or Dolly 2.0-12b better for coding?

Claude Opus 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.8 versus 23.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4 and Dolly 2.0-12b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4 has 56 scored results on Noometry and Dolly 2.0-12b has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper