Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 38 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4 Anthropic

43.1

Rank #100 Confirmed

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic

58.3

Rank #19 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 38 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4 scores higher in 0 categories and Claude Opus 4.7 in 10 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Opus 4.7 leads 53.8 to 27.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-2: 8.6% for Claude Opus 4 and 75.8% for Claude Opus 4.7.
  • Claude Opus 4.7 is cheaper at $5 / $25 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $75 for Claude Opus 4.
  • Claude Opus 4.7 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4Claude Opus 4.7
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
Noometry Index43.158.3
Released2025-05-222026-04-14
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K1M
Max output32K128K
Input $ / M tokens$15$5
Output $ / M tokens$75$25
Results tracked5666

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4: 47.2 (#62), Claude Opus 4.7: 59.6 (#13)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Claude Opus 4.7
SWE-bench Verified70.7%83.5%
GSO6.9%44.1%
WeirdML43.7%76.4%
LMArena Coding14421518
FrontierCode—38.5%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)67.6%—
Aider Polyglot72%—
LMArena WebDev—1558
SciCode—54.5%
MirrorCode—31.1%
ALE-Bench—1,323
AlgoTune1.33—

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4: 34.8 (#42), Claude Opus 4.7: 47.9 (#10)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Search11271233
Terminal-Bench—80.2%
APEX-Agents—49.2%
OSWorld 2.0—18.2%
τ²-bench Banking—40.2%
Cybench38%—
DeepResearch Bench46.8%—
PostTrainBench—28.6%
ExploitBench—26.5%
GBAEval—43.8%
GDP.pdf—21%
METR Time Horizons63.9%—
Vending-Bench 2—10,937

Reasoning Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4: 27.3 (#121), Claude Opus 4.7: 53.8 (#29)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Claude Opus 4.7
ARC-AGI-28.6%75.8%
SimpleBench58.8%61.7%
Kagi LLM Benchmark74.3%80.7%
ARC-AGI-135.7%93.5%
CritPt0.3%12%
LMArena Hard Prompts13991506
DTBench81.6%94.7%
LMCA37.4%52.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index142.67156.25
ForecastBench61.160.3
NYT Connections (extended)—39%
Chess Puzzles—30%
EnigmaEval5.6%—
Thematic Generalization—72.8%
EBR-Bench—19%
Mystery Game Puzzles—28%

Math Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4: 42.0 (#86), Claude Opus 4.7: 66.7 (#26)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Claude Opus 4.7
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202564.4%97.8%
LMArena Math13901499
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)4.5%43.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%22.9%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—70.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—31.7%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—73.6%
ProofBench—54%
Omni-MATH61.6%—
MATH Level 585%—

Knowledge Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4: 44.0 (#88), Claude Opus 4.7: 62.6 (#23)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Claude Opus 4.7
GPQA Diamond76.3%90.2%
Humanity's Last Exam10.7%36.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate12%12%
LMArena Expert13861521
SimpleQA Verified—51.7%
MMLU-Pro87.5%—
Confabulations15.9%—
GPQA (HELM)70.8%—

Multimodal Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4: 31.5 (#106), Claude Opus 4.7: 41.2 (#38)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision11921316
GeoBench49%—
VPCT38%—
Blueprint-Bench 2—24.5%
Furniture Assembly—33.3%
LMArena Document—1495

Multilingual Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4: 48.8 (#138), Claude Opus 4.7: 57.3 (#10)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Non-English13621480
LMArena Chinese13861531
LMArena French13721503
LMArena German13911495
LMArena Japanese13311472
LMArena Korean13211464
LMArena Russian13921494
LMArena Spanish13891495

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4: 77.1 (#28), Claude Opus 4.7: 78.4 (#10)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Instruction Following14061498
IFEval91.8%—

Long Context Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4: 39.6 (#172), Claude Opus 4.7: 46.2 (#25)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Longer Query14221505
Fiction.LiveBench61.1%—

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4: 61.2 (#89), Claude Opus 4.7: 75.1 (#8)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text13771490
LMArena Creative Writing13871486
EQ-Bench Creative Writing15801914
LMArena Multi-Turn13961505
Short-Story Creative Writing83.6%—
WildBench85.2%—
EQ-Bench 4—1311

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4 better than Claude Opus 4.7?

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4 or Claude Opus 4.7?

Claude Opus 4.7 is cheaper. It lists at $5 per million input tokens and $25 per million output tokens; Claude Opus 4 lists at $15 and $75.

Is Claude Opus 4 or Claude Opus 4.7 better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 47.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Opus 4.7 does, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4 and Claude Opus 4.7 share?

38 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4 has 56 scored results on Noometry and Claude Opus 4.7 has 66.

Related comparisons

Go deeper