Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen1.5-32B

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic

58.3

Rank #19 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.5

Rank #293 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude Opus 4.7 leads 62.6 to 13.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 90.2% for Claude Opus 4.7 and 30.7% for Qwen1.5-32B.
  • Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4.7Qwen1.5-32B
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index58.330.5
Released2026-04-142024-02-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$5—
Output $ / M tokens$25—
Results tracked6621

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 59.6 (#13), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Coding15181155
SWE-bench Verified83.5%—
FrontierCode38.5%—
LMArena WebDev1558—
SciCode54.5%—
GSO44.1%—
WeirdML76.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—32.3%
MirrorCode31.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete—42%
ALE-Bench1,323—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.7: 47.9 (#10), Qwen1.5-32B: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Qwen1.5-32B
Terminal-Bench80.2%—
APEX-Agents49.2%—
OSWorld 2.018.2%—
τ²-bench Banking40.2%—
PostTrainBench28.6%—
ExploitBench26.5%—
GBAEval43.8%—
GDP.pdf21%—
LMArena Search1233—
Vending-Bench 210,937—

Reasoning Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 53.8 (#29), Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Hard Prompts15061130
ARC-AGI-275.8%—
SimpleBench61.7%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark80.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)39%—
ARC-AGI-193.5%—
CritPt12%—
Chess Puzzles30%—
Thematic Generalization72.8%—
EBR-Bench19%—
Mystery Game Puzzles28%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA52.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.25—
ForecastBench60.3—

Math Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 66.7 (#26), Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Math14991155
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)70.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 431.7%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions73.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.8%—
ProofBench54%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)43.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)22.9%—

Knowledge Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 62.6 (#23), Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Qwen1.5-32B
GPQA Diamond90.2%30.7%
LMArena Expert15211126
Humanity's Last Exam36.2%—
SimpleQA Verified51.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate12%—
MMLU—74.4%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.7: 41.2 (#38), Qwen1.5-32B: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Vision1316—
Blueprint-Bench 224.5%—
Furniture Assembly33.3%—
LMArena Document1495—

Multilingual Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 57.3 (#10), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Non-English14801106
LMArena Chinese15311177
LMArena French15031101
LMArena German14951058
LMArena Japanese14721027
LMArena Korean14641008
LMArena Russian14941073
LMArena Spanish14951089

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 78.4 (#10), Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Instruction Following14981116

Long Context Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 46.2 (#25), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Longer Query15051146

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 75.1 (#8), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Text14901137
LMArena Creative Writing14861083
LMArena Multi-Turn15051140
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1914—
EQ-Bench 41311—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.7 and Qwen1.5-32B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.7 has 66 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper